An intensive investigation has revealed the identity of the man whose Social Security number (SSN) is being used by President Obama: Jean Paul Ludwig, who was born in France in 1890, emigrated to the United States in 1924, and was assigned SSN 042-68-4425 (Obama’s current SSN) in or about March 1977.

Ludwig lived most of his adult life in Connecticut. Because of that, his SSN begins with the digits 042, which are among only a select few reserved for Connecticut residents.

Obama never lived or worked in that state! Therefore, there is no reason on earth for his SSN to start with the digits 042. None whatsoever!

Now comes the best part! Ludwig spent the final months of his life in Hawaii, where he died.

Conveniently, Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Payne Dunham, worked part-time in the Probate Office in the Honolulu Hawaii Courthouse, and therefore had access to the SSNs of deceased individuals.

The Social Security Administration was never informed of Ludwig’s death, and because he never received Social Security benefits there were no benefits to stop and therefore, no questions were ever raised.

The suspicion, of course, is that Dunham, knowing her grandson was not a U.S. citizen, either because he was born in Kenya or became acitizen of Indonesia upon his adoption by Lolo Soetoro simply scoured the probate records until she found someone who died who was not receiving Social Security benefits, and selected Mr. Ludwig’s Connecticut SSN for Obama.

Just wait until Trump gets past the birth certificate and onto the issue of Barry O’s use of a stolen SSN. You will see leftist heads exploding, because they will have no way of defending Obama.

Although many Americans do not understand the meaning of the term “natural born” there are few who do not understand that if you are using someone else’s SSN it is a clear indication of fraud.

Dear President Obama: "We are not racists"

The headline in the March 3 US News & World Report reads: "Obama Says Race a Key Component in Tea Party Protests"

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2011/03/02/obama-says-race-a-key-component-in-tea-party-protests_print.html 

The article references statements made by President Barack Obama at a White House party least year, as reported by White House Correspondent Kenneth Walsh in his new book "Family of Freedom: Presidents and African Americans in the White House".

Walsh reports that at the party one of the guests suggested that when Tea Party activists say they want to "take back" their country, their real motivation is to stir up anger and anxiety at having a black president. Walsh goes on to state that President Obama didn’t dispute this notion. Obama reportedly agreed that there was a "subterranean agenda" in the Tea Party movement—a racially biased one—that was unfortunate. According to Walsh, President Obama continued by telling his guests that race was probably "a key component in the rising opposition" to his presidency from conservatives, especially the right-wing activists in that Tea Party movement. But President Obama sadly conceded that there was little he could do about it.

My wife and I are proud Teapartiers. We have met hundreds of other Teapartiers and dozens of Tea Party leaders. I’ve addressed thousands of Teapartiers as a speaker. And we’ve mingled with over a million from all 50 states at four different Tea Party gatherings on the Washington DC Mall. We have yet to encounter a single Teapartier who we believe is a racist.

We have four married children and ten grandchildren. Both my wife and I proudly share our Tea Party activities and experiences with them. With the reports about President Obama’s beliefs now viral on the Internet, I am deeply saddened and offended that my grandchildren will inevitably learn (perhaps from their classmates) that our President suspects our involvement is racially motivated, or that my wife and I are associating openly with racists.

The Tea Party movement has nothing to do with race. It’s about out-of-control government spending and debt.

The Tea Party supported many of the  32 African-Americans who ran in 2010 for Congress as Republicans; the largest number since Reconstruction. Herman Cain, an African-American business leader and radio talk show host, recently won a Tea Party straw poll for potential Republican candidates for president.

In November 2009 Republican African-American candidate Charles Lollar addressed several hundred thousand Teapartiers at the US Capital. He said:  “Some are wondering why an African-American is speaking at a Tea Party gathering. Well I’m NOT an African-American – I am an American”. The roar of approval could be heard at the White House. Lollar, who subsequently lost to Steny Hoyer in Maryland’s Fifth District, was saying it’s time to drop the “hyphens” that categorize and divide us, and come together as Americans.

In August 2010, on the 47th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s “I have a Dream” speech, his niece Alveda King spoke to over half a million cheering Teapartiers at the Lincoln Memorial. Alveda reminded us that her uncle called for a focus not on the color of one’s skin, but on the honor and character of the individual. She said we were gathered not to divide, but to unite.

Perhaps the most popular of all Teapartiers today in Congress is Republican African-American Col Alan West. In response to charges of racism in the Tea Party, West has stated: "The Tea Party is a constitutional, conservative grassroots movement — and that’s it –the Tea Party stands for three things: they want to see effective, efficient constitutional government, they stand for national security, and they stand for free market, free enterprise solutions. That’s it." 

Teapartiers have earlier been called racists by the likes of Rachel Maddow and Keith Olbermann and others in the media. Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have cast more subtle but still offensive aspersions.  I hope that President Obama has been mis-quoted in Walsh’s book, that he understands Teapartiers are not racially motivated, and that he will now use his bully-pulpit to put an end to these despicable and totally unfounded accusations.

Jack Tymann retired as Westinghouse’s President, International, where he led business development in 75 nations. He chaired the Clinton-Mubarak Middle-East Presidents’ Council, meeting regularly with Arab and Israeli leaders, and speaking at various World Economic Forums. Jack is currently Chairman of Sustainable Energy Partners, LLC in Naples. He is a frequent contributor to the Naples Daily News, a weekly guest on Naples WGUF Talk Radio, a frequent lecturer in SW Florida, and was the keynote speaker at the initial Naples Tea Party gathering in 2009.

Jack focuses on the need for limited government and a strong free private sector, and on national security issues, including an unsustainable national debt, the need for energy independence, and the threat of global Islamism. Email Jack atcommongoals2009@aol.com. 

Some are calling Egyptian President Mubarak a “brutal dictator”. But they neglect to reference specific acts of brutality over his reign.

That’s because this imperfect but decent man loves his country. He is not a Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Saddam Hussein, or Idi Amin.

Mubarak’s government has arrested members of the Muslim Brotherhood whenever they have threatened stability or slaughtered tourists. These Islamists were probably not treated gently in prison as the government sought information to protect innocent lives. Mubarak instituted security policies which have prohibited free assembly and a free media. But these hardly qualify as acts of “brutality”.

Mubarak’s very first arrest included Ayman al Zawahiri as part of a gang of Islamist thugs who murdered Mubarak’s predecessor, President Anwar Sadat, in 1981.

Zawahiri was subsequently released and exiled. He then joined forces with Osama bin Laden and formed al-Qaeda, an organization he has co-led since 1989. Bin Laden brought the money. Zawahiri brought the experience in violent jihad to assemble the al-Qaeda army of hate.

Mubarak would have been labeled a ruthless tyrant had he kept Zawahiri in prison without trial – as was his only alternative. The exposure of a national trial and the death penalty would have enraged the Brotherhood and caused chaos throughout Egypt.

After Sadat’s assassination, Mubarak secured the Egypt-Israeli peace agreement for three decades, during which time he did more than any other Arab leader in maintaining a fragile Middle East stability.

The Obama Administration now throws Mubarak under the bus, as they support the illegal Muslim Brotherhood at the negotiating table.

The Brotherhood is anathema to the principles of democracy, individual liberties, freedom of religion, women’s rights, and secular government.

The Brotherhood was launched in 1928 to fill the void in the Muslim World when Ataturk shut down the Caliphate and formed the Republic of Turkey. Since then the Brotherhood and its teachings have served as the foundation of Islamic extremism worldwide.

Egyptian Sayed Qutb, the Brotherhood’s most prominent intellectual leader in the 1950s, instituted the principle of violent jihad against citizens in secular states. His followers were eventually became teachers of bin Laden, Zawahiri, and other Islamists worldwide. The Brotherhood’s teachings have been the foundation of modern Islamic extremism. Even Ayatollah Kohemini, the first Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, studied Qutb’s principles.

Some say the Obama Administration is either naive or unknowing of the Brotherhood’s stated motives. That’s ridiculous. They are fully aware of the goals, but choose appeasement as a way forward.

I had the honor of working directly with Hosni Mubarak from 1992 – 2001 when I co-chaired the Presidents’ Council (appointed by Presidents Mubarak and Clinton). Mubarak’s son Gamal served with us. We worked to facilitate private sector partnerships between American and Middle East businessmen, and also with Israeli businessmen.

We found President Mubarak open, very approachable, friendly, charming, great sense of humor, anything but arrogant, and respectful of others’ opinions. His decisions, right or wrong, have always been based on what he believes best for his country. It’s unconscionable that he is now being labeled as something he is not by media neophytes who don’t have a clue how difficult it is to operate as a secular leader in a country rife with poverty, illiteracy, and Islamic extremists.

For 30 years Mubarak has protected a fragile peace with Israel, kept the Suez Canal open, and helped the US in the struggle against Islamic extremists. He has held the Brotherhood in check, in spite of 7 assassination attempts made on his life.

90% of Egyptians favor a role for Islam in their government, while Mubarak has held firm that Islamists have no role inside a secular government.

The genie is now out of the bottle. Going forward we must remember that Chamberlain thought we could all get along with Hitler, and that President Carter enabled the fall of the Shah of Iran. Both were wrong.

Time will tell if a miraculous transformation of the Brotherhood will allow individual and religious freedoms, or if Egypt is on the same path as Palestine with Hamas or Iran with fundamentalist rule.

There is much cause for concern, and perhaps a slight ray of hope.

Jack Tymann, as President of Westinghouse International, led business development in 75 nations, including most Muslim countries. He later founded Homeland Security Partners, focused on counter-terrorism. In the 1990s, he served on and co-chaired the Clinton-Mubarak Presidents’ Council for the Middle East. He serves on the AMIDEAST BoD, a Washington-based nonprofit promoting mutual understanding between Arabs and Americans. He is a lecturer and commentator for NewsBalance.com, the Naples Daily News, and Naples Talk Radio.