By Michael Master

www.saveamericanow.us.com

As many pundits discuss how Obama won the 2012 election, let me say that Republicans lost it more than Obama won it. The Republican party lost a wonderful opportunity to win the Senate and the White House. All of the conditions were right for a Republican victory. Obama received 10% fewer votes in 2012 than in 2008. For a party that was supposed to be so energized, Romney only got 1% more votes than what McCain got in 2008. 6% would have beat Obama. Romney and the Republicans blew it.

The swing states (Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Colorado) except for North Carolina have Republican governors. But only North Carolina, the state with a Democrat governor, voted for Romney. All of the swing states run by Republican governors voted for Obama. Not one of those Republican governors delivered his state for Romney. And that is one of the jobs of a governor for the party. The odds of that being a coincidence is less than 3%. Chris Christie of New Jersey personally handed 3 points to Obama by his fawning of Obama the week before the election. Before the storm that ravaged the east coast, Romney had 52% of the electorate as measured by Gallup and Rasmussen. By the time of the election; the poll numbers for Romney dropped to 49% as the world watched Christie become the major reference for Obama. Christie was more interested in his personal political needs than in saving America by stopping the Obama agenda. Why did Romney not get the same 57% vote in Virginia that McDonnell got for governor? It was not because of Romney. Romney won North Carolina that had a Democrat governor. McDonnell, Christie, and the other Republican governors did not bet their jobs on Romney. They did not go to the mat for Romney.
47%. Romney said that he was not interested in the 47% of the electorate that did not pay taxes. That sound bite was played over and over in all of the swing states. It was taken out of context. It helped reinforce the image of Romney that was presented by Democrats as him being rich and not interested in people who need help. Romney was wrong in what he said. He did not consider all those older people who would vote for him who do not pay taxes, or the military, or conservatives in low paid jobs. He was wrong and he never recovered from it.
All polls showed for the last 3 years that 55% of Americans want Obamacare repealed. Did you ever hear Romney say that the only way to repeal Obamacare was to get rid of Obama? Did you hear him discuss it daily the way Obama discussed Romney’s tax reductions for the rich? 55%. Romney should have won the election 55 to 45 on just this one issue.
Wisconsin has 9 electoral votes, Ohio has 18, and Florida has 29. So why did Romney pick Ryan from Wisconsin as his running mate? Why didn’t he pick Rubio from Florida or Portman from Ohio? Rubio could have also increased Hispanic votes for Romney in other states. And Ryan did not even deliver Wisconsin as a swing state. Even JFK was smart enough to pick LBJ, his enemy, as his running mate to secure the votes of Texas … and Reagan picked H.W. Bush for New England, military, and oil support … and Obama picked Biden for the union vote. Picking Ryan had the same impact as when McCain picked Palin. Romney put his personal chemistry with Ryan ahead of what was needed to win.
53% of males voted for Romney. 54% of females voted for Obama. Obama had as much of a gender gap with men as Romney had with women. They offset each other. 5% more women voted than did men. Romney did not get out the male vote as well as Obama got out the female vote. Obama gave women a reason to go vote. That was the difference in the election … 3%. If Romney had gotten 57% of the male vote or 1% more turn out of men as women, then he would have won. Romney neglected the male vote.
Half of the conservatives who vote for Republicans are Tea Party people. That is about 20% of the electorate. They were the energy of the 2010 midterm elections. They got Rubio elected. They won back the House of Representatives for the Republican Party. They were active in the local elections of 2012 and held the Congressional seats that they won in 2010. But they were absent from the presidential election. There was no march on DC of 2 million people like in 2009. There was no big event from Dick Armey to push national momentum for Romney. The Republican Party and Dick Armey deliberately neutralized the impact of the Tea Party in the presidential election … and that hurt Romney.
So what can we learn from this?

Well, many conservative activists will stay home in the future as their hopes were crushed by the performances of Romney in 2012 and McCain in 2008. But maybe, just maybe, those who fight against the evil presented by the Obama/Alinsky type of politicians will learn:

Fight the demonization quickly before it becomes fact.

Demand loyalty from the Republican governors and establishment.

Stop making stupid comments that can be used out of context by the media and the opposition.

Make decisions based on good business information.

Embrace the grassroots activists.

Then, maybe conservatives will learn how to win.

Michael Master is the author of “Save America Now!” and “Rules for Conservatives.” They can be ordered at: www.saveamericanow.us.com

Look at all of these programs. none of them purchase manufactured products. all of them are for services … studies … etc. they can all be eliminated without harming the economy at all. and if some of the money for these programs is diverted to other programs to buy products like bullets that can be shot and consumed, then the multiplier on the economy will be 15 times greater.

the switch to a service economy by Bill Clinton is one of those changes that caused the economic problems of today.

The waste in these programs is killing America. We need to save America now!

Notice S.S. and the military are NOT on this list .
These are all the programs that the new Republican House has proposed cutting. Read to the end.

* Corporation for Public Broadcasting Subsidy — $445 million annual savings.
* Save America’s Treasures Program — $25 million annual savings.
* International Fund for Ireland — $17 million annual savings.
* Legal Services Corporation — $420 million annual savings.
* National Endowment for the Arts — $167.5 million annual savings.
* National Endowment for the Humanities — $167.5 million annual savings.
* Hope VI Program — $250 million annual savings.
* Amtrak Subsidies — $1.565 billion annual savings.
* Eliminate duplicating education programs — H.R. 2274 (in last Congress), authored by Rep. McKeon, eliminates 68 at a savings of $1.3 billion annually.
* U.S. Trade Development Agency — $55 million annual savings.
* Woodrow Wilson Center Subsidy — $20 million annual savings.
* Cut in half funding for congressional printing and binding — $47 million annual savings.
* John C. Stennis Center Subsidy — $430,000 annual savings.
* Community Development Fund — $4.5 billion annual savings.
* Heritage Area Grants and Statutory Aid — $24 million annual savings.
* Cut Federal Travel Budget in Half — $7.5 billion annual savings
* Trim Federal Vehicle Budget by 20% — $600 million annual savings.
* Essential Air Service — $150 million annual savings.
* Technology Innovation Program — $70 million annual savings.
* Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Program — $125 million annual savings.
* Department of Energy Grants to States for Weatherization — $530 million annual savings.
* Beach Replenishment — $95 million annual savings.
* New Starts Transit — $2 billion annual savings.
* Exchange Programs for Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians, and Their Historical Trading Partners in Massachusetts — $9 million annual savings
* Intercity and High Speed Rail Grants — $2.5 billion annual savings.
* Title X Family Planning — $318 million annual savings.
* Appalachian Regional Commission — $76 million annual savings.
* Economic Development Administration — $293 million annual savings.
* Programs under the National and Community Services Act — $1.15 billion annual savings.
* Applied Research at Department of Energy — $1.27 billion annual savings.
* Freedom CAR and Fuel Partnership — $200 million annual savings.
* Energy Star Program — $52 million annual savings.
* Economic Assistance to Egypt — $250 million annually .
* U.S. Agency for International Development — $1.39 billion annual savings.
* General Assistance to District of Columbia — $210 million annual savings.
* Subsidy for Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority — $150 million annual savings.
* Presidential Campaign Fund — $775 million savings over ten years .
* No funding for federal office space acquisition — $864 million annual savings.
* E nd prohibitions on competitive sourcing of government services.
* Repeal the Davis-Bacon Act — More than $1 billion annually.
* IRS Direct Deposit: Require the IRS to deposit fees for some services it offers (such as processing payment plans for taxpayers) to the Treasury, instead of allowing it to remain as part of its budget — $1.8 billion savings over ten years.
* Require collection of unpaid taxes by federal employees — $1 billion total savings. WHAT THE HELL IS THIS ABOUT?
* Prohibit taxpayer funded union activities by federal employees — $1.2 billion savings over ten years.
* Sell excess federal properties the government does not make use of — $15 billion total savings.
* Eliminate death gratuity for Members of Congress. WHAT???
* Eliminate Mohair Subsidies — $1 million annual savings.
* Eliminate taxpayer subsidies to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — $12.5 million annual savings WELL ISN’T THAT SPECIAL
* Eliminate Market Access Program — $200 million annual savings.
* USDA Sugar Program — $14 million annual savings.
* Subsidy to Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) — $93 million annual savings.
* Eliminate the National Organic Certification Cost-Share Program — $56.2 million annual savings.
* Eliminate fund for Obamacare administrative costs — $ 900 million savings.
* Ready to Learn TV Program — $27 million savings.. WHY?????
* HUD Ph.D. Program.
* Deficit Reduction Check-Off Act.
* TOTAL SAVINGS: $2.5 Trillion over Ten Years

My question is, what is all this crap doing in the budget in the first place ?

By Michael Master

www.saveamericanow.us.com

Wisconsin is shouting to America. While most of the media points to the money that Walker had for the campaign, they are deliberately ignoring the most important items that Wisconsin is shouting to America:

1. Barrett received approximately 900,000 votes. When the petitions for the recall were filed, the petitioners claimed that they had close to a million signatures. The Walker team claimed that many of those signatures were bogus, but the state refused to investigate the claim and took the petitions as they were presented. The Walker team claimed that “Mickey Mouse,” “Donald Duck,” people from outside of Wisconsin, and many dead people should be eliminated from the petitions which would leave the number of signatures insufficient. Wouldn’t you expect Barrett to receive at least all the votes from those people who signed the petitions plus additional votes from the recall campaign? Well, Barrett received fewer votes than the number on the petitions. So that says to me that many of those signatures were actually bogus. And that this recall election should probably not have occurred if the state had done its job of vetting the petitions.

2. During the original demonstrations against Walker, the union employees (especially teachers) piled into the state capital buildings and kept the government from operating. The Democrats on the state legislature fled the state so a quorum for legislation could not be achieved. The media made America think that those demonstrators reflected the mood of all the people in Wisconsin. Clearly, the outcome of this recall election shows that once again the media had painted a picture as something that it was not.

3. Unions continued to push an agenda in Wisconsin that they claimed was what the people of Wisconsin wanted. According to some news reports, union people were bussed into Wisconsin for election day, union people from outside of Wisconsin were making phone calls to voters in Wisconsin, and union people were instructed to help get out the vote against Walker. If Walker had a money advantage, then Barrett had a union advantage. And if Walker got money from outside of Wisconsin, then Barrett got union help from outside of Wisconsin that did not show up on a balance sheet that was probably worth as much as the Walker money.

4. Before Walker, approximately 65,000 workers paid into the government union. After Walker enacted laws that gave workers a choice, only about 28,000 workers chose to pay into the unions. More than half of the people who were forced to pay into unions chose to opt out of making those payments when Walker gave them a choice … and that is point. The payments to unions are just another tax on workers. Unions, liberals, Democrats want mandated payments to help them survive. And most of the people in Wisconsin do not. When given a choice, Wisconsin chose to opt out. That is freedom.

So now the political pundits are trying to apply what happened in Wisconsin to the rest of the country. The liberal pundits argue that the Democrat loss in Wisconsin means nothing while the conservative pundits argue that this spells disaster for an Obama re-election. They are all ignoring what is right in front of them. If Wisconsin is a bellwether for the rest of America, then Wisconsin is telling us that:

– Americans do not want to be forced to make government mandated or sanctioned payments … not to unions, not in taxes, and not for insurance. Americans do not want Obamacare or any other government mandated payments. Americans want less government and fewer taxes and fewer payments that maintain the ruling class in unions or in government.

– The states and the Congress need to do a better job of vetting petitions, candidates, and voter rolls. By ignoring what is so obvious about fraud, the state and federal governments are allowing abuses to the system. Democracy suffers from those abuses. Federal and local governments need purge non-citizens from the voting rolls … which is estimated to be about 3% of all registered voters by some organizations (Florida just published its findings). And then candidates need to be vetted before the elections … like looking at Obama’s college documents, passports, and long form birth certificate.

Wisconsin just shouted to America. Are we listening?

Michael Master is the author of “Save America Now!” and “Rules for Conservatives.” which can be ordered at http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=ntt_athr_dp_sr_1?_encoding=UTF8&sort=relevancerank&search-alias=books&field-author=Michael%20Charles%20Master

By Michael Master, www.saveamericanow.us.com

Let’s say for the sake of argument that no Republican emerges as the clear candidate by March, so Jeb Bush enters the race in mid spring like Bobby Kennedy did in 1968 … late in the primaries. and then an uncommitted Rep convention picks Jeb after being freed from primary commitments because no winner after 2 ballots. It might take up to 7 ballots. All of America would be watching. Great press coverage.

then let’s say that Obama continues to lose ground and the economy does not improve so he asks Hillary to replace Biden (instead of Hillary replacing Obama).

then this could be the match up for the election because Jeb would not need Rubio or West:

Jeb/Condi vs. Obama/Hillary

Condi and Hillary as both being Secs of State. Condi from Cal. Condi black. Condi NFL and Nascar. Condi as professor from Stanford.

Condi vs. Hillary might keep Hillary from taking Biden’s place. Condi would be a tough foe in debates. Hillary would have to defend all of her crap like START and UN small arms treaty and lack of defense for all the Christian killings in the mid east. Condi would bring them all up. It would be a great fight … all of America would tune into it. this would scare Hillary. She might refuse to replace Biden.

Condi could say the stuff about Obama that Reps lost with Cain out of the race.

the big 4?

NY would be a lock for the Dems (22 electoral votes).

Florida (22) and Texas (38) would be a lock for the Reps.

and Cal (55) just might be a toss up.

It is hard for any Pres candidate to win without 2 of the big 4. Jeb would have a lock on 2. Obama would have 1. and Cal would be in play.

Obama would not carry Florida like in 2008 which would be a big loss for him. and he would probably lose other states that he carried like Va, NC, Wisc, Mich, Minn and Ohio. (ps. Connie Mac would beat Nelson in Fla on Jeb’s coat tails.)

watch Missouri. it is the key. if Missouri is not happy with any Rep, then watch what Jeb does.

if not, then it is probably Romney/Rubio or West vs. Obama/Hillary or Hillary/?. Romney/Rubio or West would also lock up Florida and Texas. but Cal and NY would be Dem. but Romney would have Minn, Mich, Wisc, Ohio, Va, NC, and Nev (big Mormon state), Col (big Mormon state) which all went to Obama in 2008.

By Michael Master, www.saveamericanow.us.com

Government imposed tolerance and charity are destroying America.

1. Politicians make people dependent on government to give those politicians more power

2. while those politicians promote “politically correct” tolerance of sin that is destroying our country.

Jesus was intolerant about several issues. To those who dishonored his father’s house, he whipped them and chased them out of the temple … and about those who lead children astray; Jesus said: “Whoever causes one of these little ones to sin, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” (Matthew 18:2-6).

Liberals are turning America into a secular, agnostic, dependent society and leading our children morally, sinfully, astray. Jesus would condemn them. He would not be tolerant. Have you read Romans 1: 21?

As stated by Ravi Batra and Alexander Fraser Tytler, all great nations perish as they become more “tolerant” and give up the values that made them great. Liberal politicians pander to the weak of a nation which causes erosion to its value system … weak in spirit, weak in discipline, and weak in morality.

The objective should be “how to make the weak stronger … more independent … not more dependent.”

The Pilgrims and our founding fathers were strong. They were independent … not dependent. They thanked God for their blessings. Their words in the Declaration of “Independence” were clear.

The values of a society eventually affect the economy. Because of the values of the founding fathers, America was great. The USA economy is hurting today because of erosion to its values. Higher pay for less results. Service economy at the demise of industrialization (Bill Clinton chased manufacturing out of the USA and replaced it with a service economy with a lower multiplier effect … he implemented a banana republic philosophy … redistribution of wealth from manufacturing to service). Low birth rate. Secular. Pandering to minorities and feminists. Corruption in financial institutions/banking/unions/Wall Street. A horrible education system that is more interested in teaching “political correctness” than in producing engineers and scientists. And a morally degenerate entertainment industry that corrupts our society every day.

The USA has the highest cost per student with the lowest achievement in science/math. Why? Because liberals are in control of education. Because liberal entertainers are leading our children astray. And because children are being raised by single parents. Jesus is angry.

America has become dependent on government charity. Bailouts. Quantitative easing. Excessive money printing. Subsidies. Loop holes. Government investing in private industry. Affirmative action. Student loans. Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Almost half of all adults in America pay no federal income taxes. More than half of all Americans receive some kind of support from the government. Almost half of the GDP is generated by local and federal governments. So the majority of Americans are dependent… not independent.

In a recent Gallup poll, 45% of men under the age of 40 do not mind staying home and letting the woman be the bread winner … more banana republic mentality. 50 years ago, no man in the USA would allow himself to be kept by a woman. The woman gave birth and the man provided for the family.

Child birth to the intrinsic population of the USA declined so that there are not enough births to sustain the population or the economy. 2.1 births per woman are needed just to sustain. The USA is at .9 births per white woman. That is less than half the births needed to replace each man and each woman.

The low birth rate is not a result of a poor economy. This low birth rate has been here for much longer (40 years) than the current economic problems. Women and dependent husbands are more interested in the careers of women than in bringing life into the world. The low birth rate is the result of liberal indoctrination in our schools and in our entertainment under the guise of being “progressive.” It is the result of tolerance for abortion, for gay rights, for the feminist agenda, for a secular society. The low birth rate is a root cause to our economic problems … and not a result of a poor economy.

The Roman Empire only needed two generations of no child birth to crumble. Multiple divorces, homosexuality, and single life styles were common. Europe today is suffering because of the same root causes. Like Europe and Rome, the USA is making the same mistakes by trying to use immigration to compensate for the low birth rate which is exacerbating the internal problems of the USA.

Today, 70% of all births in inner cities are to unwed mothers which increased from 20% from just 40 years ago. And our government encourages this by how it provides charity (welfare and other benefits). Also, a “woman’s right to choose” encourages more dead beat dads who feel no responsibility for pregnancy since it is a “woman’s right to choose.”

The government is enslaving the less fortunate by how it helps them … deliberately to maintain an underclass that are dependent on support from a liberal controlled government. A government system that takes from some to give to others is ripe for corruption, for lobbyists, and for crony government spending. Redistribution of wealth is theft … corrupt charity. The government stole the function of charity from religious and community organizations quietly, incrementally, with AMT (alternate minimum tax), progressive tax, and the slow elimination of tax deductions/credits for charitable contributions.

So how is all that “great society” stuff doing that LBJ started? He and all the administrations that followed him “borrowed” trillions of dollars from our Social Security trust fund to pay for it. The government has no way to pay back what it “borrowed” from Social Security so Bowles/Simpson and Paul Ryan proposed to increase Social Security taxes and to decrease Social Security benefits to bail out the government debt. The government implemented a Ponzi scheme for Social Security that fell apart as the birth rate to white people decreased and now Obama is exacerbating the problem by “borrowing” even more from it.

What are the results of government charity and forced tolerance? More government debt, more taxes, more children born to unwed mothers, more crime, lower scholastic achievement, higher college tuitions, too low of a birth rate, and diminished religious values. So was the “borrowing” worth it?

Federal government spending increased two times faster than the growth to the economy in the last 50 years because of all the government charity used to buy votes from the weak of society. Socialists, liberal Jews, black politicians, feminists, and gays preyed upon the weak to gain power for themselves.

The root causes to our current economic and social problems have been done in the name of “charity” and “tolerance” by liberal politicians who gained personally from their actions. White Christians allowed liberals to erode the American value system in the guises of government charity and tolerance. Charity belongs in the private sector … churches, temples, and charitable organizations. Tolerance of sin led our children, our future, and our economy astray. Government charity and forced tolerance must end now to save America.

Try this: http://www.saveamericanow.us.com/theproblem.html

by Michael Master
www.saveamericanow.us.com

The headline in The Washington Post: “Senate Republicans vote to Kill Obama’s Jobs Bill.”

This is more liberal media spin. It is kinda like saying: “Woman feeds dead turkey to family.”

Of course the turkey was dead. It was cooked. And of course the Republicans voted against the jobs bill. It was totally slanted to help unions … just like the previous Obama stimulus that was a total failure … and this one would incur a half “trillion” dollars more spending by the government.

But if you dig into the article, at least 6 Democrats would have voted against the bill .. and that includes Jim Webb of Virginia and Ben Nelson of Florida. Out of the 60 votes needed to bring the measure for a vote in the Senate, only 49 voted to do it. Even Harry Reid voted against bringing it for a vote. He knew it would lose.

If Obama wants to spend more money on infrastructure, then why doesn’t he cut pay to government employees to do it? Government employees already get paid 30% more than their counterparts in private industry. So no one would lose their jobs and his infrastructure plans would be implemented to employ more union people without increasing government spending.

How many Americans read the headlines without reading the details? How many Americans listen to the media sound-bites without investigating the truth?

In total, about 5 to 10,000 demonstrators are protesting “Wall Street greed” in the different cities across America. 10,000 maximum. That is all. They are financed by unions. They include criminals, jobless, homeless, and law breakers. In interviews, almost none of them pay any taxes. They are leaving their messes everywhere, even to the point of defecating in public. They have no message except that they want more from the government and they want the rich to pay for it.

2 million Tea Party people marched on DC on Sept, 2009 … none were arrested, there was no litter, most worked, and their message was simple: TEA = Taxed Enough Already

… but the media is trying to make Americans believe that the current Wall Street demonstrators are like the Tea Party.

This is much like when the media carried the stories by the Democrats that the killings in Tucson last spring were caused by the Tea Party. The Democrats lied, and the media let them do it. Giffords had a long term relationship with the shooter that the media omitted.

The media practiced this same unethical method of slanting the news in how it covered Obama in 2008 and is doing it again now in how it is covering Obama. He is campaigning for 2012 under the umbrella of the White House and they are letting him get away with it. He is using more race bating and more class warfare and the media is letting him do it.

Why aren’t we hearing more about Solyndra and Obama’s $90,000 investment in Solyndra? Why aren’t we hearing more about Fast and Furious? And how about Obama’s relationship with the banks, insurance companies, GE (Immelt), and Bernanke? What happened to the relationships between Democrats and Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae?

From Rules for Conservatives, http://www.amazon.com/Rules-Conservatives-Response-Radicals-Alinsky/dp/0983745684/ref=sr_1_6?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1317308173&sr=1-6:

The Pew Research Center studied the stories carried on the news of the three most prominent cable stations during the 2008 election. The study did not include editorial oriented shows like Olbermann, Larry King, and Hannity. It focused on just the news shows. This is how these three stations fared at reporting negative news about the two presidential candidates.

Obama | McCain

CNN – 30% | 61%

MSNBC – 14% | 73%

FOX – 40% | 40%

Since NBC owns MSNBC, it is easy to assume that all of the media outlets that are owned by NBC were as biased. If you only watched NBC affiliated stations or CNN, then your opinion of the candidates was severely slanted towards Obama. The sitcoms and late night TV did the same thing in their imbedded messages. Since GE owned NBC, it is easy to assume that GE had a stake in the outcome of the election. And it did. GE received a huge share of stimulus money in 2009 and it received unparalleled access to Obama after he was elected.

GE did this without any campaign restraints. Its actions were outside of any campaign finance laws. It controlled the news and messages imbedded in entertainment as one big advertisement to help Obama and to disparage McCain.

The media does not have to fabricate news. It does not have to lie. It only has to emphasize the stories that it wants to emphasize and de-emphasize the ones that it wants to hide. Bernie Goldberg wrote at length about how CBS and the rest of mainstream media do this in his book titled “Bias.”

Letter to Obama by Michael Master, McLean, Va. (Circa 2008)

To Barack Hussein Obama,

The New York Times carried a story on Saturday, October 4, 2008 that proved you had a significantly closer relationship with Bill Ayers than what you previously admitted. While the issue of your relationship is of concern, the greater concern is that *you lied to America about it.

The Chicago Sun reported on May 8, 2008 that FBI records showed that you had a significantly closer relationship with Tony Rezko than what you previously admitted. In the interview, you said that you only saw Mr. Rezko a couple of times a year. The FBI files showed that you saw him weekly. While the issue of your relationship is of concern, the greater concern *is that you lied to America about it.

Your speech in Philadelphia on March 18, 2008 about ‘race’ contradicted your statement to Anderson Cooper on March 14 when you said that you never heard Reverend Wright make his negative statements about white America. While your attendance at Trinity Church for 20 years is of concern, the greater concern is *that you lied to America on March 14*.

In your 1st debate with John McCain, you said that you never said that you would meet with the leaders of Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, and North Korea without ‘preparations’ at lower levels … Joe Biden repeated your words in his debate with Sarah Palin … while the video tape from your debate last February clearly shows that you answered ‘I would’ to the question of meeting with those leaders within 12 months without ‘any’ preconditions. While your judgment about meeting with enemies of the USA without pre-conditions is of concern, the greater concern is that *you lied to America in the debate with McCain.

On July 14, 2008, you said that you always knew that the surge would work while the video tapes of you from more than a year ago show that you stated that the surge would not work. While your judgment about military strategy as a potential commander in chief is of concern, *the greater concern is that you lied to America on July 14.*

You now claim that your reason for voting against funding for the troops was because the bill did not include a time line for withdrawal while the video tapes of you from more than a year ago show that you voted against additional funding because you wanted our troops to be removed immediately … not in 16 months after the 2008 election as you now claim. While your judgment about removing our troops unilaterally in 2007 is of concern, *the greater concern is that you lied to America about your previous position*.

You claim to have a record of working with Republicans while the record shows that the only bill that you sponsored with a Republican was with Chuck Lugar … and it failed. The record shows that you vote 97% in concert with the Democrat party and that you have the most liberal voting record in the Senate. You joined Republicans only 13% of the time in your votes and those 13% were only after agreement from the Democrat party. While it is of concern that you fail to include conservatives in your actions and that you are such a liberal, the greater concern is *that you distorted the truth*.

In the primary debates of last February, 2008, you claimed to have talked with a ‘Captain’ of a platoon in Afghanistan ‘the other day’ when in fact you had a discussion in 2003 with a Lieutenant who had just been deployed to Afghanistan. You lied in that debate.

In your debates last spring, you claimed to have been a ‘professor of Constitutional law’ when in fact you have never been a professor of Constitutional law. In this last debate, you were careful to say that you ‘taught a law class’ and never mentioned being a ‘professor of Constitutional law.’ *You lied last spring.

You and Joe Biden both claimed that John McCain voted against additional funding for our troops when the actual records show the opposite. *You distorted the truth.*

You and Joe Biden claim that John McCain voted against funding for alternate energy sources 20 times when the record shows that John McCain specifically voted against funding for bio fuels, especially corn … and he was right … corn is too expensive at producing ethanol, and using corn to make ethanol increased the price of corn from $2 a bushel to $6 a bushel for food. *You distorted the truth.*

You and Joe Biden claim that John McCain voted like both of you for a tax increase on those making as little as $42,000 per year while the voting record clearly shows that John McCain did not vote as you and Joe Biden. *You lied to America.

You and Joe Biden claim that John McCain voted with George W. Bush 90% of the time when you know that Democrats also vote 90% of the time with the President (including Joe Biden) because the vast majority of the votes are procedural. You are one of the few who has not voted 90% of the time with the president because you have been missing from the Senate since the day you got elected. While your absence from your job in the Senate is of concern, the greater concern is that *you spin the facts.

You did not take an active roll in the rescue plan. You claimed that the Senate did not need you while the real reason that you abstained was because of your close relationships with the executives of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Countrywide, and Acorn … who all helped cause the financial problems of today and they all made major contributions to your campaign. While your relationship with these executives and your protection of them for your brief 3 years in the Senate (along with Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer, Maxine Waters, and Chris Dodd) is of concern, the greater concern is that you are being deceitful.

You forgot to mention that you personally represented Tony Rezko and Acorn. Tony Rezko, an Arab and close friend to you, was convicted of fraud in Chicago real estate transactions that bilked millions of tax dollars from the Illinois government for renovation projects that you sponsored as a state senator … and Acorn has been convicted of voter fraud, real estate subprime loan intimidation, and illegal campaign contributions. Tony Rezko has contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to your political campaigns. You personally used your political positions to steer money to both Tony Rezko and Acorn and you used Acorn to register thousands of phony voters for Democrats and you. While your relationships with Rezko and Acorn are of concern, the greater concern is that you omitted important facts about your relationships with them to America.

During your campaign, you said: ‘typical white person.’ ‘they cling to their guns and religion.’ ‘they will say that I am black.’ You played the race card. You tried to label any criticism about you as racist. You divide America.

You claim that you will reduce taxes for 95% of America, but you forgot to tell America that those reductions are after you remove the Bush tax reductions. You have requested close to $1 Billion in earmarks and several million for Acorn. Your social programs will cost America $1 Trillion per year and you claim that a reduction in military spending ($100 billion for Iraq) can pay for it. While your economic plan of adding 30% to the size of our federal government is of concern, the greater concern is that you are deceiving America.

The drain to America’s economy by foreign supplied oil is $700 Billion per year (5% of GDP) while the war in Iraq is $100 Billion (less than 1% of GDP). You voted against any increases to oil exploration for the last 3 years and any expansion of nuclear facilities. Yet today, you say that you have always been for more oil and more nuclear. *You are lying to America.*

Mr. Obama, you claimed that you ‘changed’ your mind about public financing for your campaign because of the money spent by Republican PACs in 2004.

The truth is that the Democrat PACs in 2004, 2006, and 2008 spent twice as much as the Republican PACs (especially George Soros and MoveOn. org). *You are lying to America.

Mr. Obama, you have done nothing to stop the actions of the teachers union and college professors in the USA. They eliminated religion from our history. They teach pro gay agendas and discuss sex with students as young as first grade. They bring their personal politics into the classrooms. They disparage conservatives. They brainwash our children. They are in it for themselves … not America. Are you reluctant to condemn their actions because teachers/professors and the NEA contribute 25% of all money donated to Democrats and none to Republicans? You are deceiving America.

Oh, Mr. Obama, Teddy Roosevelt said about a hundred years ago that we Americans should first look at the character of our leaders before anything else.

Your character looks horrible. While you make good speeches, motivating speeches, your character does not match your rhetoric. You talk the talk but do not walk the walk.

1. You lied to America. You lied many times. You distorted facts. You parsed your answers like a lawyer.

2. You distorted the record of John McCain in your words and in your advertisements.

3. You had associations with some very bad people for your personal political gains and then lied about those associations.

4. You divide America about race and about class.

Now let me compare your record of lies, distortions, race baiting, and associations to John McCain: War hero. Annapolis graduate with ‘Country first.’ Operational leadership experience like all 43 previously elected presidents of the USA as a Navy Officer for 22 years. 26 years in the Senate. Straight talk. Maverick. 54% of the time participated on bills with Democrats. Never asked for an earmark. The only blemish on his record is his part in the Keating 5 debacle about 25 years ago. (For which he was cleared- Shy edit.)

Mr. Obama, at Harvard Law School, you learned that the end does not justify the means. You learned that perjury, false witness, dishonesty, distortion of truth are never tolerated. Yet, your dishonesty is overwhelming. Your dishonesty is tremendously greater than the dishonesty that caused the impeachment and disbarment of Bill Clinton. Your dishonesty is tremendously greater than the dishonesty of Scooter Libby. You should be ashamed.

Mr. Obama, it is time for us Americans to put aside our differences on political issues and vote against you because of your dishonest character. It is time for all of us Americans to put aside our political issues and vote for America first. It is time for America to vote for honesty.

Any people who vote for you after understanding that you are dishonest should be ashamed of themselves for making their personal political issues more important than character. Would these same people vote for the anti-Christ if the anti-Christ promised them riches? Would they make a golden calf while Moses was up the mountain? Would they hire someone for a job if that someone lied in an interview? … of course not. So why do some of these people justify their votes for you even though they know you are dishonest? Why do they excuse your dishonesty? Because some of these people are frightened about the future, the economy, and their financial security … and you are preying on their fears with empty promises … and because some (especially our young people) are consumed by your wonderful style and promises for ‘change’ like the Germans who voted for Adolf Hitler in 1932. The greed/envy by Germans in 1932 kept them from recognizing Hitler for who he was. They loved his style. Greed and envy are keeping many Americans from recognizing you … your style has camouflaged your dishonesty … but many of us see you for who you really are … and we will not stop exposing who you are every day, forever if it is necessary.

Mr. Obama, you are dishonest. Anyone who votes for you is enabling dishonesty.

Mr. Obama, America cannot trust that you will put America first in your decisions about the future.

Mr. Obama, you are not the ‘change’ that America deserves. We cannot trust you.

Mr. Obama, You are not ready and not fit to be commander in chief.

Mr. Obama, John McCain does not have as much money as your campaign to refute all of your false statements. And for whatever reasons, the mainstream media will not give adequate coverage or research about your lies, distortions, word parsing, bad associations, race bating, lack of operational leadership experience, and general dishonest character.

The media is diverting our attention to your relationships and ignoring the fact that you lied about those relationships. The fact that you lied is much more important than the relationships themselves … just like with Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon … Monica Lewinski and Watergate were not nearly as bad as the fact that those gentlemen lied about the events … false witness … perjury … your relationships and bad judgments are bad on their own … but your lies are even worse.

Therefore, by copy of this memo, all who read this memo are asked to send it to everyone else in America before it is too late. We need to do the job that the media will not do. We need to expose your dishonesty so that every person in America understands who you really are before Election Day.

Mr. Obama, in a democracy, we get what we deserve. And God help America if we deserve you.

Michael Master
McLean, Virginia

By Michael Master

www.saveamericanow.us.com

According to the most current USA/Gallup/CNN/AP  polls, the approval
rating for Obama by all adults … not just voters as measured by
Rasmussen … has fallen to an all time low of 42%.  Disapproval for
Obama is at 58%.

Liberals continue to try to label those who oppose Obama as racists.
So that means that 58% of Americans are racists according to liberals.

According to the IRS, the top 1% of wage earners in America account
for 20% of the income in America and account for almost 40% of all the
income taxes.   Yet, Obama says that the the top 1% are not paying
their “fair share.”

The top 25% of wage earners account for 60% of all the income and
account for almost 85% of all the income taxes.   The top 50% account
for almost all the income taxes while the bottom 50% pay almost
nothing.  About half of all adult Americans pay no federal income
taxes.

Federal income taxes are only a quarter of the total taxes paid by the
average American worker when all the local, product, property, sales,
federal, gasoline, airplane ticket, phone, etc taxes are added
together.   The combined spending by local and federal governments is
close to 50% of GDP.

This administration has doubled government spending for discretionary
items in 2 1/2 years and never produced a budget for Congressional
approval to do it.   The increases are $ 700 billion per year.   All
of it has been done by “continuing resolution” which circumvents the
law that states all federal spending legislation must include the
source of the funds for the spending.

Federal government spending increased from 18% (including Iraq) of GDP
to 24% of GDP since Democrats took control of Congress in 2007.   The
results of all that spending are no growth to GDP when inflation is
considered (probably negative growth in the 3rd quarter), 9.2%
unemployment, a continuing slump in housing demand, and a $1.75
Trillion government deficit (the deficit of the Republican Congress of
2006 was only $160 billion and unemployment was below 6% before the
Democrats took control of Congress in 2007).

Net:  the failed policies of the Democrat Congress of 2007 to 2011
caused practically all the increases to the deficit and to
unemployment.  Obama exacerbated the problem.  He is the only
president to lack both executive experience and military experience.
Since the leaders in the Republican party are RINOs, the only
challenge to Obama and Democrats has been the Tea Party.

When granted the stimulus money, Obama promised in 2009 that he would
not let unemployment rise to more than 8% from 7% in 2008.   The
Democrat controlled Congress gave him the money but he failed to
deliver on his promise.  Unemployment increased to more than 10%.
Why?   Because he spent the money to repay political favors to the
SEIU, NEA, auto unions, GE (NBC and MSNBC), banks, and for service
oriented projects … rather than spend it to buy products made with
USA components.  Products made in the USA have long supply chains for
maximum impact on the USA economic multiplier effect.  Obama used the
money for financial bail outs, for more government employees, and for
services rather than to buy products made with USA components.

The price for gasoline has increased from $1.87 per gallon when Obama
took office to a current average of $3.71 per gallon even thought the
demand for oil has decreased from 22 million barrels a day to 18
million.  Purchase of foreign oil has remained the same today as it
was in 2008 even though demand for oil in the USA decreased by more
than 20%.    Obama loaned $2 billion to Brazil to drill for off shore
oil and has not allowed any additional oil drilling in the USA.

The reason given by the government to increase the debt limit was to
keep the ratings for government securities at AAA and to stabilize the
investment markets.   As Obama signed the debt limit legislation, the
stock market fell dramatically as Moody’s and S&P announced that the
debt legislation did not cut enough spending by the government
immediately and that a downgrade to government securities could happen
if deeper cuts are not made to current government spending.

The proposed cuts to government spending do not address the most
glaring areas of spending.  How much does the USA federal government
spend on foreign governments, spend for pay to government employees,
spend on education when education is a state issue, spend to implement
Obamacare, and spend on establishing more regulations for the
environment and business?  Why are these expenses not being cut now?

Is Obama a failure or is he deliberately trying to sabotage the USA
economy?  Either way, he must go!

Michael Master is the author of “Save America Now!”    It can be
ordered at http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1616235756

by Michael Master

Read here:

The Aug. 2 ‘Deadline’ Lie

By Michael Master

www.saveamericanow.us.com

In my early years at IBM, we were taught to think. Signs that read “THINK” were hung everywhere.

Then we lost something. IBM almost went out of business in 1990. Deficits, negative cash flow, were wiping out the retained earnings in the business. Desk top computers and off the shelf software were changing the use of computers. Foreign competition was taking market share. Domestic computer companies were dying or being consolidated. IBM wondered away from the basic beliefs of the founder, Tom Watson. The collective thinking in IBM was to raise prices to increase revenue to cover expenses … and that thinking was a failure. The incest of promoting from within the organization for 75 years stifled innovation. We had stopped thinking.

IBM in 1990 was much like how the USA government is today.

The IBM Board of Directors hired Lew Gerstner as CEO to save the company. They went against the wishes of the IBM organization. Gerstner was the first CEO in the 75 years of IBM to not come from inside of the company. He had eye sight and ideas that were previously ignored. Gerstner was from outside of the internal politics in Armonk, NY. He owed nothing to anyone.

What did he do?

1. he re-emphasized and re-implemented the basic beliefs of the founding father, Tom Watson.

2. he cut payroll expenses.

3. he focused on making better and cheaper products.

4. he cut out all the fringe programs and all frivolous product development.

5. he focused on the core business.

The share price of IBM stock increased from $42 to $152 in 20 years (more than 300%). Sales increased by almost 100%. IBM is profitable. And IBM will celebrate its 100th birthday in just a couple of years while almost all the other pre-1975 computer companies have disappeared.

So what can we learn from Mr. Gerstner? What can we learn from IBM?

We can learn to THINK critically. We can learn to question. We can learn to discover root causes to problems rather than just attack the symptoms. We can learn that the system and people who cause problems are not the ones who will solve those problems. We can learn that the American people need to assume their role as the board of directors of the USA and do what is necessary to save America.

It is time to think about these things:

AARP and SEIU were the biggest supporters of Obamacare. Both of them have been granted exceptions to it along with 1469 other organizations. Why is Obamacare OK for the rest of us when the 2 biggest supporters of it are not going to do it? What did insurance companies get in Obamacare for their $20 million of contributions to Obama? Why are benefits decreasing and premiums increasing with Obamacare? So why is the USA implementing Obamacare?

Labor is the biggest expense of the federal government. So why are we not reducing government expenses by reducing the pay to government employees without laying any of them off?

The core business of the federal government is protection of Americans and protection of the Constitution. So why is the government involved in so many other things? What needs to be cut?

The core values of our founding fathers are documented in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. So what exactly do those documents say? Why don’t our children understand what are in those documents when they graduate from high school? Why do children who are home schooled score so much better on standardized tests than those who are taught in our government run schools?

Manufacturing has decreased 70% as a percent of GDP. What keeps the USA from making better and cheaper products?

Oil purchases from foreign countries drain $700 billion from the USA each year. So why isn’t the USA replacing foreign oil with domestic oil, nuclear, and coal as soon as possible?

The birth rate to white women is only half of what is needed to maintain the USA population with internal growth. What is keeping white American women from breeding?

It is time to think! What needs to be done to save America? Who can lead us to do it?

America needs someone like Lew Gerstner. We need someone from outside of the incestuous federal government, outside of the ruling class in Washington, DC to lead us … to save us.

Michael Master is the author of “Save America Now!” It can be ordered at http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1616235756