Hon. James David Manning, PhD asks 5 questions about Hurricane Irene, HAARP, and Barack Hussein (Long Legged Mack Daddy) Obama. Recorded on 29 August 2011.

Hon. James David Manning, PhD speaks about the New York Daily News Article written by Michael J. Feeney. Recorded on 26 August 2011.

www.saveamericanow.us.com

Many liberals point to the fact that the USA was founded by immigrants and that is why the USA should open its borders to more immigrants now.

Yes, and our founding fathers were also cautious about the effects of immigration. That is exactly why they demanded in the Constitution that the president be a natural born citizen.

Without immigrants and their offspring for the last forty years, the USA population would be 200 million today instead of 300 million. One third of the current population is from immigration which is too much for a culture and an economy to assimilate, so now our culture and our economy are paying the price.

A congressman who wishes to remain anonymous discussed this with me for an hour in his Washington office in the spring of 2010. He said that Congress was well aware of the problems caused by too low of a birth rate to Caucasians in the 70s and 80s. He went on to say that the federal government deliberately allowed immigration in large numbers in the 90s and early 2000s to compensate for those low birth rates so there would be enough young, lower paid employees to work at McDonalds, pick our crops, clean our homes, and mow our lawns. He said that Congress did not foresee the problems that would be caused by such a huge amount of immigration. Congress underestimated the effects on our health system, our schools, and our communities.

He said that “Congress did not foresee the problems of increased immigration.”

Wow, Congress did not foresee the problems. And how many other problems does Congress not foresee from its actions? How about Obamacare, increasing the debt ceiling, and increasing the federal deficit?

This immigration problem is not only in the USA. It is throughout the industrialized world. England is feeling it. France is feeling it. All of Europe is feeling the pains of increased immigration to offset the impact of low birth rates to Caucasians. On October 17, 2010, the BBC posted an article about German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, titled “Merkel says German multicultural society has failed.” Merkel states: “(at) the beginning of the 60s our country called the foreign workers to come to Germany and now they live in our country.” She added: “We kidded ourselves a while, we said: ‘They won’t stay, sometime they will be gone’, but this isn’t reality.” “And of course, the approach [to build] a multicultural [society] and to live side-by-side and to enjoy each other… has failed, utterly failed.”

Why did the Germans encourage immigrants to come to Germany for the last fifty years? Because they did not have enough younger, lower paid German employees to do the lesser jobs due to a negative birth rate. All of the industrialized nations had too low of intrinsic birth rates and all of them encouraged immigration to solve it. So, all of them are paying a price economically and culturally because of high immigration to offset low birth rates. And this is exactly what liberals and the New World Order want. It is the ultimate method to redistribute the wealth and to dilute the dominance of conservatives in traditional western cultures.

The huge amount of immigration to industrialized countries from third world countries has been disastrous. Yahoo News posted this article on February 10, 2011:

PARIS (AFP) – French President Nicolas Sarkozy declared Thursday that multiculturalism had failed, joining a growing number of world leaders or ex-leaders who have condemned it.

“My answer is clearly yes, it is a failure,” he said in a television interview when asked about the policy which advocates that host societies welcome and foster distinct cultural and religious immigrant groups.

“Of course we must all respect differences, but we do not want… a society where communities coexist side by side.”

“If you come to France, you accept to melt into a single community, which is the national community, and if you do not want to accept that, you cannot be welcome in France.”

“We have been too concerned about the identity of the person who was arriving and not enough about the identity of the country that was receiving him.”

British Prime Minister David Cameron, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Australia’s ex-prime minister John Howard and Spanish ex-premier Jose Maria Aznar have also recently said multicultural policies have not successfully integrated immigrants.

The issue is not immigration. The issue is the volume of immigration. The issue is assimilation into the culture. Industrialized countries allowed huge amounts of immigration because their birth rates were so low. That huge volume hampered assimilation. Western Europe learned the hard way. What will it take for the USA to learn that it needs to curtail immigration and make more babies … quickly?

Michael Master is the author of “Save America Now!” It can be ordered at
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1616235756

www.saveamericanow.us.com

Even though the Obama administration claimed “mission accomplished” when the GDP finally increased, this economy is still in trouble.

GDP is increasing because of increased prices and not because of increased product volumes. Costs for labor and services are increasing … but not product volumes. Manufacturing and housing construction remain low and that spells disaster.

My comments of last April stated: “if the USA grew exports by 100%, that would only take us to 22% (of GDP) which would still be a far cry from 35% in 2000. Also, the world competitors are not about to allow the USA to grow 100%. They will adjust.”

The Kiplinger Letter of June 17, 2011 states: “The economy seems especially fragile… 2% GDP growth (that is much less than inflation) … so far the average is just 72,000 (jobs) per month (200,000 is needed to maintain the current unemployment level and 400,000 are needed to reduce the unemployment level substantially) … (oil) $90 a barrel (50% more than just one year ago) … will businesses opt out of health coverage? Paying a penalty for not covering workers would be less costly than providing coverage… The US trade deficit will rise this year … exports will grow by 12% … but imports … also up 12%.”

Drudge posted on June 20, 2011 that unemployment among blacks in the USA is at 16% with 17.5% for black males and almost 41% for teenage blacks.

So what exactly is so good about the economy?

Nothing. As stated by several economic sources: this is the slowest recovery since 1932. This administration certainly owns the failure of the recovery. This administration is a failure.

Why do blacks continue to support this administration? Why does Wall Street continue to pump lots of money into the Obama campaign? Why do young single women continue to endorse Obama?

Because other things are more important to them than the economy.

Well, why did 80% of Jews vote for Obama? Why do they provide 25% of the funding for Democrats? Given the continued economic failures of Democrats since they took control of Congress in 2007, Jewish support of Democrats cannot be based on economic reasons.

Why would 96% of blacks vote for Obama when 17.5% of black males are unemployed?

Why did 70% of single white women under 40 years old vote for Obama?

There is racism in America. There is communism in America. There is hatred towards white Christian men. The votes of blacks, Jews, and single young white women are for reasons other than what is economically good for America … and now America is paying a huge economic price because of it.

According to the latest estimates from the OMB, Obamacare will cost America another $2.4 trillion over the next 10 years. As more corporations choose to opt out of providing healthcare, benefits will decrease and premiums will increase for the average American. $2.4 trillion equates to somewhere between 1 1/2 and 2 million killed jobs. So why would single women, blacks, and Jews want to continue with Obamacare?

Race, communism, and rebuff of white Christian men.

According to Money Magazine, Forbes, and Kiplinger, this recession will continue longer than necessary because of wasted money on stimulus programs that had no multiplier effects on the economy. Implementation of Obamacare will exacerbate it.

When George W. Bush was president, liberals complained that the economy was in horrible trouble when unemployment was 6%. John Kerry personally labeled it irresponsible. So why are liberals so accepting of 9% unemployment now? Why do they not condemn Obama for this 9% unemployment when he promised to keep it under 8%?

Liberals are not really interested in the economy. They are more interested in the goodies that government will give them, in having the government take care of them, and in keeping the white Christian men from dominating them … even against their own best economic interests.

Young single women, blacks, and Jews elected Obama. We need to help educate them about how they harmed America and themselves when they voted for Obama in 2008 so they will not do it again in 2012.

We need to help them see that this is still about the economy.

Michael Master is the author of “Save America Now!” It can be ordered at http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1616235756

www.saveamericanow.us.com

What does it take to get a job?  My daughter is a current job seeker.  It is hard to watch her.  It breaks my heart. 
 
With unemployment more than 9% and underemployment more than 10%, it is hard for her to find a job that is something that she wants to do. 
 
There are thousands of people applying for every job and for every grant.  So it takes more than being good at what you want to do to get a desired job.  
 
Why is it so hard?
 
According to several financial periodicals, this is the slowest economic recovery since 1932. 
 
Housing sales are low which affects lots of other industries like furniture and appliances etc.   And “new housing sales” are only one third of what they need to be to sustain the economy.  “New housing” is the key because it creates jobs through the construction supply chain and ancillary products like furniture and appliances. 
 
Inflation for energy and food are high which sucks money out of the economy.  And the combination of unemployment and underemployment are very high (close to 20%) which reduces demand for products and creates too much competition for each job. 
 
The federal deficit has increased from $160 Billion to $1.75 Trillion in just 30 months with no improvement to the economy because people with no business experience implemented it.        
 
The little secret is that the most important statistic is not the unemployment number.  The most important statistic is the total disposable income of Americans.  70% of the economy is based on consumption … and disposable income is decreasing as wages fall and taxes increase which causes a squeeze on money available for consumption.  That leaves less money for folks to buy stuff.   So that squeeze eventually causes more unemployment. 
 
The governments (federal and local) are playing a shell game.  While they have us focused on income taxes, they increase all kinds of other taxes like road tolls, gasoline taxes, taxes imbedded in programs like Obamacare, sales taxes, etc.   
 
Employment increased in the the first quarter of 2011.  But 2 problems were hidden from the public as the administration wants us all to just focus on the increase in jobs. 
 
1.  half of the new jobs are for minimum wages.   Employing 200,000 more people at McDonalds and Walmart does not replace the buying power lost from 200,000 unemployed manufacturing workers or 200,000 unemployed lawyers.  To trade a worker who earns $50 per hour for one who earns $10 per hour is insane .. but this government is trying to sell us that the economy is getting better because more people are employed even though those replacement jobs are for lots less money. 
 
2.  jobs are not being created as fast as new workers are entering the work force.  Just to maintain the unemployment percent at its current level, 200,000 net new jobs are required each month.  To reduce the unemployment percent to less than 6% within the next 18 months, 400,000 net new jobs are required each month.   This administration has not come close to that yet in 2 1/2 years of trying and $1.75 trillion of deficits.    5% unemployment is considered to be full employment.  At 20% for unemployment and underemployment, we are very far from full employment.
 
Food prices are increasing from the increased costs of transportation and corn (ethanol increased the price of corn 100% in the last 6 months and corn is used to feed live stock and provide milk).  The increase to GDP is from inflation … not from product sales.    Increased prices are driving up the GDP, not increased product sales.  So even though this administration claimed “mission accomplished” because GDP increased,  … job creation is a failure.   And since the true inflation is more than the 2%,  the economy is actually shrinking in terms of net present value.   We are still in a recession. 
 
As the government keeps pumping money into the economy and spending lots of it for more government,  that will only make things get worse.   Government actions destroy the will of the people.  It was like that in 1974.   By 1980, Carter drove unemployment to 12% and inflation to 16% with his big government spending before anyone noticed it.  It was hidden in how the numbers were calculated.   This current government is doing the same thing.   For the average family, inflation is close to 10% when food and gas are included.
 
The current actions of unions are exactly opposite of supply/demand economics.   And when an entity is forced to employ from unions, that exacerbates the economic problems for the employer and for the economy.   GM stock price has not increased because the bailout only temporarily held off the inevitable … unions cause companies to be uncompetitive in the world market.  While the liberals and the media have us all focused on Wisconsin for political reasons, two liberal states, Massach

www.saveamericanow.us.com

Tim Kaine, the previous chairman of the Democrat party, just stated that Weiner’s lies to the public are unforgivable. Even though the lies were about sex, how can anyone trust Weiner? Lies are the issue. Weiner needs to resign.

So what does that mean about Bill and Hillary Clinton? Bill lied to the public. Bill committed perjury. And Hillary was complicit. She even said that the claims about Bill’s infidelity were from a “vast right wing conspiracy.” So why didn’t Tim Kaine and other Democrats say that Bill needed to resign?

And what about Charlie Wrangle, William Jefferson, Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, etc. The list of Democrats who lied to America in the last few years goes on and on and on.

Is Tim Kaine correct? Are lies to the public by these politicians unforgivable? So why do so many people continue to vote for these Democrat liars?

They vote for them because character is not as important to them as their political agenda. They vote for them because their hatred for conservatives is stronger than their hatred of sin. They vote for them because those voters want the “goodies” that these liberal politicians promise to give them. They vote for them because religion and race are more important than character.

These lying politicians are the very ones who cause addiction to government, who use class warfare, envy, coveting, to gain votes.

“Thou shalt not bear false witness.” “Thou shalt not covet.” “Thou shalt not steal.” Lying, coveting, redistribution of wealth are sins.

Both Michael Bloomberg and Eric Cantor, Republicans, stated that America should not get “messed up” up in this situation. They both stated that Weiner’s constituency should decide what to do about Weiner in this next election. Both Cantor and Bloomberg are Jews like Weiner. Did they put their Jewish ties ahead of what is good for America? A recent poll of people in Weiner’s New York district showed that a majority of them are Jewish and want Weiner to stay in his job.

Do Bloomberg and Cantor and the Weiner constituents understand that the majority of Americans cannot trust dishonest people to do good work for America even if they are of the same religion as seen recently in NY district 26. We cannot trust liars to put America first?

Teddy Roosevelt: “Character comes first.”

In a Democracy, we get what we deserve. Those Americans who continue to vote for these politicians who lack character are getting what they deserve. This recession is a product of compromised values. It is a product of the break down in morality and ethics in America.

A nation who covets and lies and takes from some to give to others is reaping what it sows. This recession is a product of Weiner morality. Race first. Religious group first. Character last.

This issue with Weiner presents us Americans an opportunity to look hard at what is important vs. what should be important. Character should come first. America should come first.

Unethical behavior starts from the top down. So now let’s look at Obama’s character. Let’s look hard at his associates like Ayers and Wright and Rezko and Jones and Wall Street and insurance companies. Let’s look hard at his claims in his books vs the truth. Let’s review his dual citizenship. Let’s inspect his college documents, his passports, and his state legislation to legalize infanticide. Let’s review his comments like “his Muslim faith.” Let’s inspect him like the media did not do in 2008. Let’s put character first. Let’s put America first.

Michael Master is the author of “Save America Now!” It can be ordered at http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1616235756

I just completed reading Jerry Corsi’s book, Where’s the Birth Certificate.

Jerry enlightened me about several things concerning Obama’s citizenship.

first: if you are born in the USA, you are native born and not necessarily natural born. if you come to the USA and gain citizenship, then you are naturalized. So there are 3 types of citizenship: native born, naturalized, and natural born. A person must be natural born to be president of the USA.

second: a person who has been naturalized in another country loses any natural born status in the USA. It is probable that Obama was naturalized in a foreign country (Indonesia) and never renounced that foreign nationalization.

third: while it is possible to have dual citizenship, dual citizenship eliminates natural born status. The most current certificate of live birth produced by Obama shows that his father passed citizenship to Obama from Great Britain and then from Kenya. Did Obama ever accept that foreign citizenship as an adult by using it on college applications or on passports? A Democrat hacker destroyed the Obama file in the State Department and then was killed 2 weeks later as the FBI was about to question him.

forth: Obama was never vetted about his citizenship by any group prior to the 2008 election. Nancy Pelosi (speaker of the House and head of the Democrat party in 2008) deliberately changed the standard wording on the Democrat party certification about Obama’s ability to run so that she was not certifying his natural born status.

It is clear from Corsi’s book that Obama probably does not qualify as natural born even if he is native born.

Jerry Corsi has a PhD from Harvard. His book is a most thorough investigation of this whole Obama citizenship issue … and it lays out why the courts and the Congress refuse to deal with it. They have deliberately made other things more important than this stipulation of Natural Born in our Constitution.

After watching how the media treats other issues like George Allen calling someone a “maccaca” or the picture of the Congressman from upstate NY with his shirt open or Foley’s telephone calls; it is shocking to me that the media is not investigating the facts in Corsi’s book.

Everyone should read “Where’s the Birth Certificate.”

www.saveamericanow.us.com

Obama is a disaster which is about to get worse.   Hidden Inflation, too low of interest rates, super high deficits, and accelerated growth to government with no results at helping the economy are about to take a massive toll on America.

Kiplinger Letter stated that this is the slowest recovery to any recession since 1932.  If nothing else, Obama owns the failure of this recovery.  

According to the statistics presented in USA Today of May 31, 2011, Obama is ineffective in leading America out of this recession.  These are the statistics compared to other recessions at the same point in time as this one: 

                                      1975                1982                1991                2001                current

 Unemployment %         7                      7                      7                      6                      9         

Housing Starts Index 180                  140                  150                  130                  96

Decreased housing demand started the recession and housing demand continues to be falling.   What will happen to housing when interest rates are increased?  This economy is due for more problems because of Obama’s failure to fix its problems.

These are comments from economists in Kiplinger Magazine of June, 2011:

Mark Zupan (Economist and Dean of the School of Business at the University of Rochester):  “Easy money is the big risk …. The root cause of the coming inflation is the Federal Reserve’s easy-money policy in support of the Federal government’s stimulus efforts. Rising government spending has been rapidly swelling our debt (now more than $14 Trillion).  And the Fed’s actions erode the dollar’s purchasing power, which means imports become more expensive. In addition, with more dollars now chasing fewer goods and services, the prices for those goods and services have begun to rise.  Based on producer-price increases registered so far this year, we could see consumer prices increasing at a 6+% clip late this year…Some people say that inflation is not a risk because of slack employment and because the consumer price index has been rising only modestly.  However, the core CPI excludes food and energy.”

Michael Dueker (former research economist at the Federal Reserve Bank):  “Too much money chasing too few goods is the classic recipe for inflation.   And one ingredient is already here – the $2.2 trillion in stimulus money pumped into the economy by the Federal Reserve….  The Fed will rein in cash to head off inflation. “

Jeremy J. Siegel (professor at University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School):  “One of the biggest threats facing investors is the possibility that massive US budget deficits and the Federal Reserve’s easy monetary policy will lead to significant inflation…  Although stocks do well when annual inflation is in the range of 2% to 5%, their performance begins to falter when inflation exceeds 5%…inflation sparks higher interest rates, and  interest rates are a key variable in calculating current stock prices…Companies can’t always pass along increased costs, especially in the case of an important raw material such as oil.  As a result, many companies will see their profits squeezed.  Stock prices also falter in the face of rising inflation because investors fear that the Fed will hike interest rates.”

Stock prices are increasing because of low interest rates.  The GDP is increasing because of inflation.  Neither one is increasing because of more manufacturing output or a stronger economy.  Current GDP growth is less than 2% which is less than the real rate of inflation.  The combination of these variables will cause this house of cards by this current administration to implode on itself. 

Obama is destroying America.  His deficits, bailouts, and too low interest rates cannot solve the root cause problems to our economy.  His actions are about to exacerbate these root causes to our problems: 

1.  A Low birth rate to white people from 40 years ago is causing decreased demand for housing today and causing decreased demand for ancillary products of housing like furniture and appliances.  That low birth rate is also the reason for insolvency of Social Security and Medicare.   
2.  High union labor rates, high taxes rolled up through the manufacturing supply chain, and a lack of engineering graduates is chasing manufacturing out of the USA.
3. The lack of oil drilling is causing an economic cash drain from the USA and causing high energy costs.
4. Current tax rates, educators, entertainment, abortion laws, and social mores are encouraging young adults to marry later, have too few children, and purchase fewer homes/home furnishings than previous generations at the same ages.   

If interest rates increase, what will happen to 401Ks, to the housing market, and to the general economy?  Just look at what happened when Jimmy Carter was president.   The combination of high interest rates and high inflation killed the economy.  Unemployment exceeded 12% and all forms of assets lost value, especially real estate.

So what is Obama doing to correct these root cause issues?  Nothing.  He does not know what to do.   He is a puppet of Wall Street (especially Goldman Sacks … Bernanke) who gave him a million dollars for his 2008 campaign, a puppet of insurance companies (who wanted Obamacare, especially AARP) who gave him twenty million dollars, and a puppet of unions (who are exempt from Obamacare … especially teachers’ unions).

Wall Street has been making a fortune from the easy Fed money and too low of interest rates as stock prices become more inflated than what company earnings can justify.

Obama let it all happen.   He fertilized the root causes to our problems rather than kill them.  He is either incompetent or corrupt or both.

Obama lacks the needed executive and business experience to be president of the USA.   He lacks a moral compass.  He is a community organizer.

Obama needs to go so we can save America from the problems that he has fertilized. 

Michael Master is the author of “Save America Now!”    It can be ordered at http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1616235756

Hon. James David Manning, PhD says black people will be politically,economically, and numerically extinct, if they don’t become Republicans. Recorded on 26 May 2011.

The US Senate just rejected the proposed budget of Barack Hussein Obama by a vote of 97 to 0.

That is correct. All Democrats and all republicans in the Senate rejected the spending plans proposed by Obama. The Ryan budget fared better than the Obama budget.

Timothy P. Carney made the following comments in the Washington Examiner on May 26, 2011:

“Obama spent two years pretending to battle special interests, all while institutionalizing bank bailouts, letting drug companies and insurance companies write healthcare reform, handing out trillions in subsidies to tech and green energy companies, supporting ethanol subsidies (production of ethanol increased the cost of corn and associated food products), giving tax dollars to failed automakers, granting special breaks to politically connected labor unions (like for teachers and exemptions for Obamacare), and setting off a feeding frenzy on K Street. Americans see that the politically connected are thriving at everyone else’s expenses while Obama calls for common sacrifice.

… Obama shattered records in raising funds from Wall Street, big Pharma, and tech companies like Google and MicroSoft. Obama’s $1 million haul from Goldman Sacks (recipient of a special contract to process all Fed transactions and home of Ben Bernanke) in 2008 was more than any politician had raised from a single company …”

Obama is a bought man. He is a puppet. He sold out the common tax payer in America. He lacks any executive experience. And he lacks any executive integrity because he never was an executive. He was a community organizer.

From Rules for Conservatives (due to be published at the end of the summer, 2011):

The Ideology of Change.

Saul Alinsky: he (the community organizer) does not have a fixed truth – truth to him is relative and changing.

The objective of the radical is change. It does not matter from what or to what. The objective is change. Without causing change, there is no need and no justification for the community organizer.

Saul Alinsky points out that the community organizer is not interested in political ideology. The organizer is interested in power, and that power is gained through promoting change. If the society is black, then change it to white. If the society says yes, then teach it to say no. The implementation of change provides power to those who lead the effort. And power is the objective… not any specific ideology.

Let me add that change is both a noun and a verb. While the objective might be change (a noun), the act of change is a verb …. change this or change that. Change as a verb is action. It grabs the imagination. It causes followers to act blindly just because of being part of “changing” something. To Alinsky and radicals, change is the ideology. Right or wrong, change provides power. And all that matters to the community organizer is how to seize power. Radicals seize power in the process of promoting change …. any change.

What change was promised in the 2008 election? None was really defined. Problems with healthcare, financial organizations, and the economy were highlighted to stir up the “Have-nots” and the “Want-Mores,” but the solutions encapsulated by the word “change” were vague other than to close Gitmo and get out of Iraq within a year … of which neither was done within the year following the 2008 election as promissed.

Change was sold. And change was bought. Change is the real ideology of radicals and community organizers. Any change that can justify their existence. Any change that can provide more power to them.

Of Means and Ends.

Saul Alinsky: Does this particular end justify this particular means?

So many of us have been taught, especially by religious teachings, that the end does not justify the means. Saul Alinsky instructs radicals to throw out that concept. He clearly states that “the means-and-end moralists or non-doers always wind up on their ends without any means.”

To Saul Alinsky, not only does the end justify the means, but winning justifies anything and everything. The radical, the community organizer, must use a value system that eliminates a moral conscience in order to seize power from those who have it. All actions must be fair game depending on the particular end. You would not kill someone to win a baseball game (that particular end would not justify the means), but you might threaten to kill a family member of a judge to stop that judge from ruling against you and/or your cause.

Lying? No big deal if it helps accomplish the objective of seizing power.