Dr. Manning Interviews Dr. John Drew, President of the Marxist Club at Occidental College.
Recorded on 7 May 2012

“ATLAH: THAT’S WHAT GOD SAID.”
Anointed to establish families, churches and businesses, unlike any the world hath seen. Indeed the final product of the land, ATLAH, will boast of being the seat of the world’s banking, business, and education centers.

Love us or hate us?
Please Support Us

http://bit.ly/wP2lQ1

Dr. Manning Interviews Dr. John Drew, President of the Marxist Club at Occidental College.
Recorded on 7 May 2012

“ATLAH: THAT’S WHAT GOD SAID.”
Anointed to establish families, churches and businesses, unlike any the world hath seen. Indeed the final product of the land, ATLAH, will boast of being the seat of the world’s banking, business, and education centers.

Love us or hate us?
Please Support Us

http://bit.ly/wP2lQ1

Truth on the Scaffold

The Occupy Wall Street movement has earned my support for these very pronounced reasons. It is abundantly clear that there is corruption in our courts, Congress, banking, and business institutions. To deny that injustice occurs against the poor in these institutions is a moral crime. When the Texas energy company Enron went belly up, poor and working class people were robbed of their life savings and livelihoods by a runaway Wall Street type of corruption. To oppose Occupy Wall Street is tantamount to supporting the criminals who drove Enron into the ground while stealing from its own workers. To point out that many who are leading the movement are Marxist or Socialist is to say that truth and justice can only be pursued by Republicans or Conservatives. Moreover, we must remember that when governments or Oligarchs become oppressive, it drives the poor to a defensive form of social response namely Communism or Socialism.

I have painfully observed that racism is alive and gaining influence in America and around the world today. Like all other social phenomenon, it has changed and adapted to the modern state that it finds itself in. I have identified this new state as Post Modern Racism. However, it is also true that racism is a spiritual evil that exist only between Negroes, Europeans, and Westerners.

Or one could say socially that were it not for the presence of Negroes there would be no racism to speak of. Further, the advent of political correctness has increased the incidents and the power of racism. Ku Klux Klan or Jim Crow racism was far less formidable and most easy to identify and protect yourself from.

There are abundant historical facts proving since the disposing of the name Negro, Blacks have begun a fast pace journey into economic, social, and numerical extinction. It is evident with the illegal election of Mr. Obama who has an immediate White parent in his heritage which initially, psychologically tainted his Black identity among groups like the NAACP and many purest Black leaders and groups.

However, Blacks since the 1950s have been trending toward very poor leadership choices, and the abdication of the moral and family values that sustained them during the antebellum period. Yet, it has become Post Modern Racism true that Black leaders don’t help Black people become a more socially profitable people. The best example of this truth is Mr. Obama. But, it is also true that Blacks refuse to hold their Black leaders accountable while they religiously hold White America liable for every aspect of failing Black life.

Under the Post Modern Racism standard of Black leader, Blacks lead in every negative social indicator in America hands down. One of the worst negatives is that Blacks lead in abortion, but also single parent homes, men who make no commitments to their children or women. This negative has greatly crippled the Black community and is at the tipping point of being irrevocable. While it is true that some Blacks have ventured into vocations once reserved for Whites only, it is also true that they have not developed the intellect to understand how to change The Hood and lift all boats.

Politics in America that was once divided along social and policy lines of Hawks and Doves, Pro Choice, and Pro Life have now become centered on racism alone. However, this is Post Modern Racism and far more insidious than the Ku Klux Klan or Jim Crow. The Illegal election of Mr. Obama was primarily done because he was Black and held to a different standard; a standard that many psychologically deny when convenient or painful, but many also never fail to tout that he is the first Black president, or a racial accomplishment.

The Liberals had their choice and brand of racism in the 2008 election. Now the conservatives, not to be out done have found in Herman Cain the same racist opportunity to get even. However, I must admit the Liberals made a better “I am not a racist” choice in Mr. Obama than did the Conservatives. Herman Cain is a spiritual and intellectual train wreck in Times Square on New Year’s Eve. However, Ann Coulter states that our Blacks meaning Conservatives are better than their Blacks meaning Liberals.

The problem with America today is the death of truth in our churches and Congress and the birth of political correctness in academia and the media. The media that was once the referees have now become a group of bounty hunters which brings wholesale lies, dead or alive to the American people. One may desire to place a bet on which will utterly fall first. The whole Black nation , where the members hold themselves responsible for nothing in the journey to extinction, or the whole White nation who hold no truth to be self evident of their racist behavior.

Dr. James David Manning

Obama & the Eighty-One Percent True Believers

Are Barack’s Followers Mindless Fanatics?

Recent polls reveal a giant gap in Obama’s approval between parties, with 81% of Democrats approving Barack’s job performance, while only 12% of Republicans concur. Despite unprecedented failure, why do liberals strongly approve Obama’s performance? Barack’s hyper-political stance and stunningly inept decisions ought to repulse every patriotic American. Hasn’t Obama been revealed as the JaMarcus Russell (failed NFL #1 pick) of American politics, losing every contest while steadfastly refusing to study the offensive play-book, or ponder team history?

What explains such self-destructive Democrat loyalty, which will destroy the party if not renounced? American philosopher Eric Hoffer wrote on zealotry, explaining why fanatics join irrational mass movements such as the Communists and Nazis. His works are seminally important for understanding crazed leftist hysteria.

I. The True Believer

Hoffer’s masterpiece, The True Believer: Thoughts On The Nature Of Mass Movements investigates mass fanaticism. Published in 1951, it was immediately hailed a classic. It offers insights into the troubled psyches of those mindlessly swept into highly destructive political cults. Hoffer defines a “true believer” as “the man of fanatical faith who is ready to sacrifice his life for a holy cause.” We see here the essential religious nature of the undertaking. And while Hoffer includes religious zealots, he mostly focuses upon the great political religions of our age – Communism and Nazism.

How could modern liberalism possibly fit this description? Well, a large portion of today’s “neo-liberals” are socialists demanding big government, tending towards atheism, and mostly indistinguishable from the generic fanatics Hoffer describes.

The True Believer mentality has certain essential characteristics. First, their goal is creating massive societal change. Second, these superficially prefer action over introspection. Third, these have a millenarian, ie “Last Days” interest in changing earth into paradise. Fourth, they’re committed to self-sacrifice to achieve their fantastic goals. Fifth, they desire group orientation, exchanging self for a herd identity. Sixth, they possess a “sinners” guilty mentality, goading them towards the pseudo-salvation offered by the glorified group. Seventh, they decry current society, claiming it outrageous, demanding epic change. Eighth, they may not have a God, but always devils to attack. Nine, the movement’s spirit is hatred, excoriating all enemies. Hoffer writes “Hatred becomes a habit.” Ten, all political struggles are cast in Manichean terms of black and white, good and bad, etc.

II. Motivation For Fanatics

What is it that makes people into unthinking, fanatical believers who would torch the world to achieve unrealistic and unjust goals? 

A. Change

All fanatical mass movements are essentially premised on the promise of “Change.” Hoffer writes,

It is a truism that many who join a rising revolutionary movement are attracted by the prospect of sudden and spectacular change in their conditions of life. A revolutionary movement is a conspicuous instrument of change.

But why is change so attractive? Hoffer claims empty, dissatisfied yet ambitious people are prime candidates for such zealotry. He believed most at risk are word-smiths longing for some great artistic achievement, but stymied by mediocrity – like professors, journalists, writers and scholars.

Of such destructive “Men of Words,” Hoffer wrote:

Mass movements do not usually rise until the prevailing order has been discredited…the deliberate work of men of words with a grievance…It is easy to see how the faultfinding man of words by persistent ridicule and denunciation, shakes prevailing beliefs and loyalties, and familiarizes the masses with the idea of change. What is not so obvious is the process by which the discrediting of existing beliefs and institutions makes possible the rise of a new fanatical faith.

Hoffer claims if zealots believe they have power to provoke revolution, it makes all the difference. He cites Marxism in the Russian Revolution as such doctrine acting as dynamite.

For men to plunge headlong into an undertaking of vast change, they…must have the feeling that by the possession of some potent doctrine, infallible leader or some new technique they have access to a source of irresistible power. They must also have an extravagant conception of the prospects and potentialities of the future. Finally, they must be wholly ignorant of the difficulties involved in their vast undertaking. Experience is a handicap."

One notes Obama demanding positive change. Yet he’s clueless on how such happens. The biggest reason for Barack’s failures: He’s an absolute amateur.

In general, fanatical groups have certain qualities, says Hoffer:

All mass movements generate in their adherents a readiness to die and a proclivity for united action; all of them, irrespective of the doctrine they preach and the program they project, breed fanaticism, enthusiasm, fervent hope, hatred and intolerance; all of them are capable of releasing a powerful flow of activity in certain departments of life; all of them demand blind faith and singlehearted allegiance.

B. Religion

The nature of fanatical movements is religious. Zealots invariably consider themselves holy. A universal spiritual impulse drives them towards a higher cause, to sacrifice themselves to it, and also find a selfless group identity. Overall, while liberals might be atheist, agnostic, or non-heterodox believers, they still have religious impulses.

Of religious instincts, Hoffer writes:

When our individual interests and prospects do not seem worth living for, we are in desperate need of something apart from us to live for…Hence the embracing of a substitute will necessarily be passionate and extreme…the faith we have in our nation, religion, race or holy cause has to be extravagant and uncompromising…We cannot be sure that we have something worth living for unless we are ready to die for it…Every mass movement is in a sense a migration – a movement toward a promised land.

People can support revolution when seeking meaning for their lives. Here a person becoming “liberalized” away from religious beliefs still needs a raison d’être. Hoffer claims mass movements offer similar elements as traditional religions.

C. Hope

Hoffer says fanatic groups always appeal to “Hope,” writing:

One of the most potent attractions of a mass movement is its offering of a substitute for individual hope…Those who would transform a nation or the world…must know how to kindle and fan an extravagant hope.

C. Flight From Freedom

Hoffer claims a driving force in fanatical psychology is escapism from the ponderous burden freedom mandates. Ultimately, fanatical movements like neo-liberalism avoiding the fear and pain associated with responsibility. He writes,

Unless a man has the talents to make something of himself, freedom is an irksome burden. Of what avail is freedom to choose if the self be ineffectual? We join a mass movement to escape individual responsibility, or, in the words of the ardent young Nazi, "to be free from freedom." It was not sheer hypocrisy when the rank-and-file Nazis declared themselves not guilty of all the enormities they had committed. They considered themselves cheated and maligned when made to shoulder responsibility for obeying orders. Had they not joined the Nazi movement in order to be free from responsibility?

Obama claims people shouldn’t be put under the fearsome burden of failure, even from their own bad choices. Writes Hoffer, “Freedom of choice places the whole blame of failure on the shoulders of the individual. And as freedom encourages a multiplicity of attempts, it unavoidably multiplies failure and frustration.”

3. Potential Converts

Hoffer finds converts to be most often from the following categories: 

(a) the poor, 
(b) misfits, 
(c) outcasts, 
(d) minorities,
(e) adolescent youth, 
(f) the ambitious (whether facing insurmountable obstacles or unlimited opportunities),
(g) those in the grip of some vice or obsession, 
(h) the impotent (in body or mind), 
(i) the inordinately selfish, 
(j) the bored, 
(k) the sinners.

Of this group, Hoffer describes misfits as aspiring to achieve something great, but for some defect, are unable. Permanent frustration drives them towards ego fulfillment some other way.

Hoffer writes,

The permanent misfits are those who because of a lack of talent or some irreparable defect in body or mind cannot do the one thing for which their whole being craves…and can find salvation only in a complete separation from the self; and they usually find it by losing themselves in the compact collectivity of a mass movement. By renouncing individual will, judgment and ambition, and dedicating all their powers to the service of an eternal cause, they are at last lifted off the endless treadmill which can never lead them to fulfillment.

Of the inordinately selfish, Hoffer paints a somber picture, writing,

The inordinately selfish are particularly susceptible to frustration. The more selfish a person, the more poignant his disappointments. It is the inordinately selfish, therefore, who are likely to be the most persuasive champions of selflessness. The fiercest fanatics are often selfish people who were forced, by innate shortcomings or external circumstances, to lose faith in their own selves. They separate the excellent instrument of their selfishness from their ineffectual selves and attach it to the service of some holy cause. And though it be a faith of love and humility they adopt, they can be neither loving nor humble.

Consider the extraordinary self-absorption and selfishness of typical liberal politicians. Of Clinton’s decision to use Monica Lewinsky as a plaything, or Hillary’s decision to sacrifice everything human upon the alter of power. Consider Al Gore’s selfish decision to defy the 2000 election. But is Obama most selfish of all? Consider – he visited his own half-brother in Kenya, living off a dollar a month in a plywood shanty-town. And the millionaire senator, while boasting in speeches of “being my brother’s keeper,” apparently offered not a cent!

Hoffer claims the bored are the largest group feeding members to fanaticism.

There is perhaps no more reliable indicator of a society’s ripeness for a mass movement than the prevalence of unrelieved boredom…The consciousness of a barren, meaningless existence is the main fountainhead of boredom…Pleasure-chasing and dissipation are ineffective palliatives. Where people live autonomous lives and are not badly off, yet are without abilities or opportunities for creative work or useful action, there is no telling to what desperate and fantastic shifts they might resort in order to give meaning and purpose to their lives.

America now specializes in bored, disaffected youth. If these receive any moral instruction in public school, it’s probably Marxist (from the humanistic doctrines of Marxist John Dewey). The collapse of the church as a public institution make the surrender complete. And such indolent rubes make perfect cannon fodder for the Political Correctness wars.

3. Hatred & Deviltry

Is there any trait more characteristic of modern leftism than exclaiming hatred towards opponents? Opposition to George Bush was so vitriolic, it defies explanation, coming to embody right-wing devilishness. Yet, was he really that bad? Is he supposedly worse than Obama? If not (is a more leadership challenged president than Barack imaginable?) where’s the tsunami of hatred reserved for bad leaders?

Hoffer writes,

Passionate hatred can give meaning and purpose to an empty life. Thus people haunted by the purposelessness of their lives try to find a new content not only by dedicating themselves to a holy cause but also by nursing a fanatical grievance. A mass movement offers them unlimited opportunities for both. Hatred is the most accessible and comprehensive of all unifying agents…Mass movements can rise and spread without belief in a God, but never without belief in a devil. Usually the strength of a mass movement is proportionate to the vividness and tangibility of its devil.

3. Self Sacrifice

Hoffer claims the main goal of leaders of fanatic groups is to imbue in their followers the instinct for self-sacrifice, even to the point of self-annihilation. He says,

The vigor of a mass movement stems from the propensity of its followers for united action and self-sacrifice. When we ascribe the success of a movement to its faith, doctrine, propaganda, leadership, ruthlessness and so on, we are but referring to instruments of unification and to means used to inculcate a readiness for self-sacrifice.

Hoffer claims such an orientation towards deep self-sacrifice means followers are left in the dark about reality. He writes,

The readiness for self-sacrifice is contingent on an imperviousness to the realities of life. He who is free to draw conclusions from his individual experience and observation is not usually hospitable to the idea of martyrdom… All active mass movements strive to interpose a fact-proof screen between the faithful and the realities of the world. They do this by claiming that the ultimate and absolute truth is already embodied in their doctrine and that there is no truth nor certitude outside it…It is the true believer’s ability to "shut his eyes and stop his ears" to facts that do not deserve to be either seen or heard which is the source of his unequaled fortitude and constancy.

3. Application

Comparisons between Hoffer’s book and the current administration should surprise no one, since neo-liberalism is simply warmed over Marxism. This being the same root fostering the poisonous plant of communism, murderer of at least 150 million Russians and Chinese last century.

The Obama administration is the closest thing to a socialist leader ever for America. Most appalling is the blind adherence to socialist dogma, without any concern for the destroyed individual lives, businesses, economy, or global safety as this class war plays out.

A. Anti-Democracy

Hoffer’s fanatics preached democracy, but offered the opposite in power. The Obama administration prefers non-democratic means. The appointment of unscreened policy “Czars” is symbolic. When Barack insisted Obamacare pass despite less than majority support, it launched a direct attack against the Declaration’s promise to seek “consent of the governed.” That Obama’s Congressional leaders pass legislation “so we can find out what is in it” is an absurd rejection of representational government.

B. Anti-Capitalism

Hoffer’s zealots outlawed free enterprise, like the communists, or dictated its boundaries, like Nazis. Obama targets capitalism like a True Believer, regardless of costs to private citizens. Reason Magazine’s article “The Government’s Catastrophic Response to the Oil Disaster” details astounding mismanagement of the oil spill, including the White House shutting down every possible Gulf rig, then lying about it.

C. Anti-Freedom

Hoffer’s zealots agreed private citizens were not fit bearers of freedoms. Only “the group” knew right from wrong. Obama has signaled he’d enjoy banning books, limit free speech, regulate the Internet, etc. Stalin would approve.

D. Anti-Religion

True Believers all regulated religion, or banned it. Obama is now increasingly touting Islam. The bizarre topper is turning NASA into a global Islamic evangelical unit. It’s no surprise the non-church attending and apparently anti-Christian and seemingly Marxist Obama touts a religion with shockingly intolerant views.

E. Anti-Life

In the fanatic secular religions Hoffer describes, and in Islam, is a shocking disregard to death, murder, suicide and Jihad. Obama is America’s most pro-abortion president. His shielding of Jihadists while banning the “War on Terror” is simply shocking.

3. Conclusion

Modern liberalism is a fact-allergic ideology touting long disproved doctrines. Further, it will destroy every distinctive feature of the West, including freedom, prosperity, and our political vitality. Yet, on an apparent suicide mission, liberals cannot stop until socialism destroys the economy, and the doctrines of Political Correctness dissolve the foundations of society.

Hoffer asks an important question,

What ails the frustrated? It is the consciousness of an irremediably blemished self. Their chief desire is to escape that self—and it is this desire which manifests itself in a propensity for united action and self-sacrifice…Such diverse phenomena as a deprecation of the present, a facility for make-believe, a proneness to hate, a readiness to imitate, credulity, a readiness to attempt the impossible, and many others which crowd the minds of the intensely frustrated are, as we shall see, unifying agents and prompters of recklessness.

Hoffer seems to have an Obama in mind when discussing what drives certain aggrieved men to fanaticism:

However much the protesting man of words sees himself as the champion of the downtrodden and injured, the grievance which animates him is, with very few exceptions, private and personal. His pity is usually hatched out of his hatred for the powers that be.

All of America is now paying for the anger Barack felt years ago, imagined or not. Our question: Can we survive 2.5 more years until the True Believer Marxist fanatic is driven from the White House? Until then, we are all in the gravest danger imaginable.

By Dr. James David Manning

I grew up watching the great rivalry between the Boston Celtics and the LA Lakers. The competition between Larry Bird and Magic Johnson was classic.

Perhaps the most magnificent truth between Blacks and Whites in America can be found in the history of that rivalry. I also grew up at the close of the greatest period of Black or Negro accomplishments in the history of the planet. I am delighted to acknowledge the building of great schools for Negroes like Howard University, Morehouse College, Tuskegee Institute and Fisk University. During this period Negro churches flourished as the moral and religious gathering ground for community and national development. Small businesses owned by Negroes prospered from the small but stable incomes of a fully employed Negro community.

My generation, The Negro Generation was in full agreement and acknowledged the Holy Bible as truth; and Jesus as the most color blind loving friend my mother ever knew. She would quote Jesus, an alleged White only Saviour with a trust that I dare not tread upon. While we were a monolithic Christian community with no mixture of Islam, the second religion of my generation was education, education, education.

There was a sense that we were in competition with White America. Not a malice fed rivalry, but we were about the business of building a great society of Negroes who respected White accomplishments.

The Larry Bird, Magic Johnson rivalry existed as a mascot for the integrity of Negro youth and the fights between Joe Louis and Max Schmeling was the same for Negro men.

It was the golden age of Negro men and their unprecedented  
fatherhood. The Negro man and Joe Louis taught the Negro boys how to intellectually and confidently compete for financial success and to honor the Negro woman with hard won victories.

The Negro communities were full of Negro men, who ran small businesses with humble White customers. The churches were filled with Negro deacons. One out of every four teachers in the segregated schools was a Negro man.

My generation had a Negro father snoring in every home at night and a two-tone Ford in every garage.

The Negro man was a strong protector of his daughters and a defender of Jesus. Indeed, the competition in the boxing ring was a release for the unspoken competition economically and morally between the races. Every time Willie Mays, Jackie Robinson or Joe Louis won, they won one for the Negro people, but when they lost, no riots occurred, just acceptance and planning for the next contest.

This was the age of your father’s after shave lotion. Every Negro home had a father in the bedroom at night, and a strong smelling after shave on the dresser.

All of a sudden, things changed. A violent war was declared between the races. The sports arenas were abandoned as the venue for competition between the races, and riots broke out in ghettos all over America as a form of political dissent by The Black Man. In what is still an unexplained phenomena the sons of former business men began to rob and pulverize their own people, and the Negro and the smell of the after shave fragrance was replaced by the smell of heroin cooking in the bathrooms.

Shortly thereafter I heard a Black Muslim say Jesus was a blue-eyed devil and that all White men were devils.

Up until that announcement we, the Negro people were winning. We were not seeking to overthrow America, but to grow America. We had problems with some Whites, but respect for America and all White people was the order of the day for Negroes, but not for the Black man.

Then things began to fall apart. The age of the Black Muslims and Black Panthers were like watching your best friend die as these groups were born. I asked my father, “Why Cassius Clay was refusing to go into the army.” I also asked my father, “Why did Cassius Clay want to be called Muhammad Ali.” I did not like that name Muhammad, it seemed barbaric. My father never answered. In one of a very few rare moments, my father, a Christian and a Negro never answered.

Once when Floyd Patterson was fighting during the Friday Night  
Gillette Cavalcade of Sports, my father accidentally hit me with a left hook trying to imitate Floyd Patterson. With the advent of Muhammad Ali, for the first time in my life my father was not excited by a Negro boxer, who denounced both Negro and Christianity.

I knew something was wrong when my father stop watching Muhammad Ali, but I didn’t know how wrong things had gone, nor could I ever have imagined that one day two of the most famous names on the planet would be Muslims names, Osama and Obama.

A few weeks ago I asked Jesus if Muhammad Ali’s debilitating sickness is a curse or punishment for his support of Islam and abandonment of Christianity; Jesus never answered.

Many if not all of the Negro businesses are gone now. In Harlem,(now Atlah) the world’s most famous Black community, only 3% of the businesses are owned by African Americans, who were once The Black People, who were once Negroes. Pride in the Negro schools is now replaced with rap music and metal detectors. In one of Harlem’s most celebrated high schools, Frederick Douglass High, gang members and drug dealing are more visible than basketball. The Negro father, provider and nurturer,is as rare as Aqua Velva in most Negro homes today.

This absence of the Negro father, provider, and business man occurred shortly after the rise of Muhammad Ali and the acceptance of Islam; when the birth of The Black Man was the death of the Negro father. Indeed, the Negro father disappeared in the catastrophic polemic of changing the Negro from being Negro, to being Black. One day I looked up and the most famous men of my hue were no longer Negroes but Black men; Muhammad Ali, Malcolm X, and Elijah Muhammad. I still remember hearing the chants; the most well-known man on the planet is Muhammad Ali.

This social change was extremely difficult and brutal for Dr. Martin Luther King. The master of social change would not stop using the word Negro in his speeches; and many called him an Uncle Tom for not making the transition.

The Negro was gone and the Black man had arrived, “Houston, The Buzzard Has Landed.” The Christian allegiance was gone and the Muslim faith was a better fit for The New Black Man. It seemed only Negroes remained Christian in those days and The Black Man became Bolshevik and Muslim.
Now you need to know the word Negro and Black are one and the same in definition, except Negro has a Latin root and Black has an English root meaning, yet the preferred word Black, empowered a segment of our society with the opportunity to display their hatred for White Americans. Indeed, to speak the juggernaut differences between the two people. The social identity of Black was, we are in your face Whitey, we be Black, you be White.
When Smokin’ Joe Frazier knocked Muhammad Ali on his jack-ass, I thought to myself; #1. There is the classic battle between Christianity and Islam; and #2. The answer that my father never gave me came from the right hook of Joe Frazier, Jesus kicked Muhammad’s butt.

With even more death and destruction on the horizon; Paul Robeson, Josephine Baker, and James Baldwin all became Bolsheviks, Marxists, and Socialists; while Islam and Pan-Africanism swept the ghettos like a hotel maid.

Rapidly the Negro schools and colleges died, and young Black men, the sons of former Negroes began to rob and burglarize the Negro communities. The Negro school teacher and scout leader was replaced by Black drug dealers and pimps. The Negro family fell apart and Black prison population rose like a fourth of July firecracker rocket.

The Negro turned in his lunch bucket for a welfare check, all in the name of his new Black whore, The New Black Woman.

The White counterpart also turned to Marxism. They did not abandon their great schools, but rather took over the anti-Black pro-Negro media, and turned it into an anti-Negro pro-Black spring board.

The pro-Islamic Marxist media loved Muhammad Ali, for the billions he generated in ad revenues. When Smokin’ Joe won the title they hardly even acknowledged it. He was just a dumb Negro caught in an Uncle Tom nightmare. Sadly as Dr. King was challenging this new Black Bolsheviks/Socialist Movement, many accused him of being funded by the Communist. The celebrated leadership of The New Black Man scorned Dr. King and claimed he was holding the Black man down, and leading dumb Negroes to trust a White Jesus and let the blue-eyed devil White man slap both sides of his face.

Even more sadly is the liberal socialist media chose to support The New Black Man and began to marginalize and shut out the voices of the disciples of Booker T. Washington, Jesus, and my father.

Now, if you look very carefully you can see that we are reaping the bitter harvest of the influence of The New Black man, The Marxist/ Socialist, The Islamic and Liberal White ideas all spawn in the period of the death of the Negro.

Barack Hussein (The Long Legged Mack Daddy) Obama is the sum total product of this movement that got started a generation ago by both Blacks and Whites. This is their hour; they are in charge of government, business, education, religion, and media. Where will we go from here?

Support ATLAH Ministries. You can give online at http://atlah.org/store/page2.html. Recorded on Thursday, 10 December 2009. Follow us on twitter http://www.twitter.com/atlahworldwide

[stream flv=x:/www.atlah.org/amnFeaturedVideos/videoFLV/December2009/AMNEuropeanUnionSovietUnion.flv width=340 height=315 img=x:/atlah.org/atlahBanners/welcomeFeaturedVideos.jpg bandwidth=med mp4=x:/www.atlah.org/amnFeaturedVideos/videoFLV/December2009/AMNEuropeanUnionSovietUnion.mp4 title=The European Union The Soviet Union World skin=imeo logo=x:/atlah.org/atlahBanners/amnBug.jpg /]