My prediction is still that Hillary Clinton will be the Democrat presidential candidate or the VP candidate for 2012. This has been my prediction since Feb, 2011 (15 months ago).

The Obama strategy of dividing America by gender, by working women vs housewives, by students vs workers, by religion, by wealth, and by race is not working. He will either drop out just before the Democrat convention for personal reasons or will announce Hillary as his running mate.

Obama’s lawyers are conceiving a deal right now to keep future presidents and Congress from looking at his college documents, forged birth certificate, and passports about his citizenship. He is negotiating immunity from prosecution just like done by Nixon and Bill Clinton.

Hillary is the Democrat weapon to Democrats to keep them from losing both the Senate and the White House. The media has been selling her for the last 18 months. The fix is in the works. An Obama loss will lose the Senate on his coat tails. Democrats will do anything to keep from losing either the White House or the Senate. They need to maintain one of them to keep a reversal from happening to all of their agenda for the last 4 years. Union bosses, bankers, and Soros are very concerned … and they control the Democrat party. Obama is raising money and building a campaign organization to hand to Hillary.

These discussions are taking place right now. Hillary and Bill are assessing the situation. Hillary might not do it if she thinks that a Romney/Rubio ticket cannot be beat. Rubio = Catholics (40% of the electorate), Hispanics (12%), youth (20%), and Florida. Obama got 3/4 of the Hispanic and youth votes in 2008. Any loss to either of them is disastrous to him. Rubio will take from both of them and add at least 5 more points to Romney. The Clintons are trying to figure out how many points can Hillary win back for herself from Romney/Rubio as Pres or to help Obama as VP?

Read these polls closely. All of Obama’s strategies are falling apart. Student loans. Fairness. Gas prices. Free Market vs. govt. War on the Catholic Church. Obamacare. War on motherhood. Blaming Bush about the economy. Did you hear Romney’s answer to Obama about the definition of “fairness” and about the state of the economy? Romney is negating every one of Obama’s tactics.

Obama cannot hide behind “fairness” or blame Bush any longer. His divisive strategy is a loser. As said by Romney, Obama had 2009 and 2010 with total control of the House and the Senate, he had 2011 and 2012 with control of the Senate … and what did he do with it? Obama wasted almost 4 years. He divides America rather than unite us.

Look at the trend lines of Romney vs Obama in the following charts to figure out for yourself where this election is going.

If Romney gets to 51% vs Obama in the polls, then Hillary is a done deal … but will she do it if Rubio adds another 5 points to Romney and pushes Romney to 56%. Hillary and Bill are trying to figure out if this is a lost cause.
Read the trend lines on these charts and polls and make up your own mind. Right now, the Democrat power guys see Obama as a bad investment. Goldman Sachs put a million dollars into Obama in 2008. Goldman Sachs is now putting all its money into Romney.

Related Articles

Radio Update: 70 percent Say Working Through College Better Than Student Loans
50% Think More Government Regulation Means Less Fairness
Most Prefer Cutting Mail Delivery to More Subsidies for the Postal Service
44% Blame Government Regulations for Higher Gas Prices
Voters See Free Market, Not Government, As What Made America Great
Virginia Senate: Allen (R) 46%, Kaine (D) 45%

Missouri Senate: Steelman (R) 49%, McCaskill (D) 42%

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

During Election 2008, Rasmussen Reports projected that Barack Obama would defeat John McCain by a 52% to 46% margin. Obama won 53% to 46%. In 2004, Rasmussen Reports was the only firm to project the vote totals for both candidates within half a percentage point. Learn more about the Rasmussen Reports track record over the years.

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows Mitt Romney earning 49% of the vote, while President Obama attracts support from 44%. Three percent (3%) would vote for a third party candidate, while another four percent (4%) are undecided.

As the campaign unfolds, the role of government in American society will again be debated. Just 22% of voters believe more government leads to more fairness. Fifty percent (50%) believe increased government regulation leads to less fairness.

The president and Romney have both spoken on the topic of student loans recently, but most Americans think other options should be on the table. Scott Rasmussen’s radio update notes that 70% think it’s better for a student to work through college and take six to eight years to graduate rather than taking student loans. Half (48%) believe student loans drive up the cost of tuition.

A president’s Job Approval rating is one of the best indicators for assessing his chances of reelection. Typically, the president’s Job Approval rating on Election Day will be close to the share of the vote he receives. Currently, 46% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the president’s job performance. Fifty-three percent (53%) at least somewhat disapprove.

As the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to hear the federal government’s challenge to Arizona’s immigration law, 59% of voters believe police officers should check the immigration status of those they stop for traffic violations.

Most Americans believe the price of gas could reach $5 a gallon in the next few months. Forty-four percent (44%) believe government regulations are primarily to blame, while 32% point to speculators.

Scott Rasmussen’s radio update for the WOR Radio Network earlier this week noted that only 27% think government investments made America great. A much larger number give credit to the free enterprise system.

Intensity of support or opposition can have an impact on campaigns. Currently, 24% of the nation’s voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-one percent (41%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -17 (see trends).

Rasmussen Reports has been a pioneer in the use of automated telephone polling techniques, but many other firms still utilize their own operator-assisted technology (see methodology). Pollsters for Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton have cited our “unchallenged record for both integrity and accuracy.”

Daily tracking results are collected via telephone surveys of 500 likely voters per night and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. To reach those who have abandoned traditional landline telephones, Rasmussen Reports uses an online survey tool to interview randomly selected participants from a demographically diverse panel. The margin of sampling error for the full sample of 1,500 Likely Voters is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Results are also compiled on a full-week basis and crosstabs for full-week results are available for Platinum Members.

Like all polling firms, Rasmussen Reports weights its data to reflect the population at large (see methodology). It is important to remember that the Rasmussen Reports job approval ratings are based upon a sample of likely voters. Some other firms base their approval ratings on samples of all adults. Obama’s numbers are almost always several points higher in a poll of adults rather than likely voters. That’s because some of the president’s most enthusiastic supporters, such as young adults, are less likely to turn out to vote.

Among other targets, Rasmussen Reports weights data by political party affiliation using a dynamic weighting process. While partisan affiliation is generally quite stable over time, there are a fair number of people who waver between allegiance to a particular party or independent status. Our baseline targets are established based upon separate survey interviews with a sample of adults nationwide completed during the preceding three months (a total of 45,000 interviews) and targets are updated monthly. Currently, the baseline targets for the adult population are 36.1% Republicans, 32.8% Democrats, and 31.1% unaffiliated. Likely voter samples typically show a slightly larger advantage for the Republicans.

Partisan affiliation is typically a key indicator in Presidential election years. Over the past 20 years, exit polls have shown the party identification numbers ranging from even to a 7 point Democratic advantage. The Democrats’ best year was 2008 while 2004 showed the best numbers for the GOP.

Are there others that you want to send this information?

http://atlah.org Recorded on 26 April 2012.

“ATLAH: THAT’S WHAT GOD SAID.”
Anointed to establish families, churches and businesses, unlike any the world hath seen. Indeed the final product of the land, ATLAH, will boast of being the seat of the world’s banking, business, and education centers.

Love us or hate us?
Please Support Us

http://bit.ly/wP2lQ1

http://atlah.org 2012 Presidential Candidate Dr. Laurie Roth speaks to Dr. Manning on the Manning Report. Recorded on 25 April 2012.

“ATLAH: THAT’S WHAT GOD SAID.”
Anointed to establish families, churches and businesses, unlike any the world hath seen. Indeed the final product of the land, ATLAH, will boast of being the seat of the world’s banking, business, and education centers.

Love us or hate us?
Please Support Us

http://bit.ly/wP2lQ1

http://atlah.org Dr. Manning reports on the suspension of Newt Gingrich’s presidential campaign. Recorded on 25 April 2012

“ATLAH: THAT’S WHAT GOD SAID.”
Anointed to establish families, churches and businesses, unlike any the world hath seen. Indeed the final product of the land, ATLAH, will boast of being the seat of the world’s banking, business, and education centers.

Love us or hate us?
Please Support Us

http://bit.ly/wP2lQ1

http://atlah.org Dr. James David Manning calls Harry Alford a hypocrite. Recorded on 19 April 2012.

“ATLAH: THAT’S WHAT GOD SAID.”
Anointed to establish families, churches and businesses, unlike any the world hath seen. Indeed the final product of the land, ATLAH, will boast of being the seat of the world’s banking, business, and education centers.

Love us or hate us?
Please Support Us

http://bit.ly/wP2lQ1

http://atlah.org Political correctness gives black people power. Recorded on 19 April 2012.

“ATLAH: THAT’S WHAT GOD SAID.”
Anointed to establish families, churches and businesses, unlike any the world hath seen. Indeed the final product of the land, ATLAH, will boast of being the seat of the world’s banking, business, and education centers.

Love us or hate us?
Please Support Us

http://bit.ly/wP2lQ1

Dr. James David Manning speaks about the 2nd day of the ATLAH’s Mother Keturah Breakfast Program. Recorded on 17 April 2012.

“ATLAH: THAT’S WHAT GOD SAID.”
Anointed to establish families, churches and businesses, unlike any the world hath seen. Indeed the final product of the land, ATLAH, will boast of being the seat of the world’s banking, business, and education centers.

Love us or hate us?
Please Support Us

http://bit.ly/wP2lQ1

By Michael Master January 21, 2012

www.saveamericanow.us.com

Mitt seems like a good man. He could be good for America.

After listening to him at the SC debates, listening to his speech after the SC election, and then listening to him on Chris Wallace, it is obvious to me what he needs to do.

Mitt sounds and acts too moderate. He talks too much and too fast. It comes across slick. And that will not fly at getting the Republican nomination or in beating Barrack/Hillary.

When asked by Wallace if Mitt was mad or angry about the direction of America, Mitt said that he is “upset.”

Upset? What kind of word it that?

When Wallace kept calling Mitt “Sir,” Mitt did not stop him and say for Wallace to call him “Mitt.” Wallace used “Sir” to make Mitt look cold and unemotional to America and Mitt never sat back to hear it. Newt would not have missed it. How is Mitt going to do in debates with Obama when the media will definitely be liberally biased if he cannot even react to Wallace correctly in a personal interview?

Mitt’s banner reads “restore America” which is totally unemotional. “Restore” is something that you do when something is worn out.

How about “Save America?” “Save” is something that you do when it is about to die. WND, Free Republic, NewsMax, TownHall, Newt, Santorum all use “save.” Is Mitt listening?

When asked what departments need to be cut out of the executive branch, Romney answered that several need to be reduced … but did not offer that any need to be terminated.

When asked about Bain, Romney got into a defensive intellectual discussion about capitalism, rather than becoming indignant and attacking Obama about Solyndra GM, etc. Mitt should have said: “If private investors will not invest in GM, Solyndra, etc., then why is the government using tax payer money to do it? These must be bad deals or private investors would invest in them. That is what we did for a living at Bain. We figured out what was a viable deal and what was not. We figured out how to “save” companies and jobs if it was at all possible. Otherwise, we shut them down. We invested in those that looked like winners which created hundreds of thousands of jobs like at Staples and Sports Authority. This administration should not be involved in deals that the private industry will not do. It lacks the skills and experience. Only 8% of the Obama team has any real life experience in the private sector. So what makes it think that it is smarter than the free enterprise system?”

The Romney budget plan is a compromise. It is a diet plan rather than surgery.

Romney is losing momentum because he is playing it safe. He looks, smells, and acts like a moderate … and conservatives will not vote for a moderate. He is like the basketball team that goes into a defensive strategy at the end of a game and loses because the other team gains momentum to out score them.

Mitt needs to play like Tom Brady. He needs to play hard, throw the ball, and score lots … all the way to the end buzzer, even if it means running up the score against the opposition. Patriots = 48 vs Lions = 20 was a good score. Romney would have stopped at 30 and then lost the game.

Conservatives want a candidate who will help save America. They want a candidate who will take the fight to the Democrats. They want someone who will run up the score and soundly defeat the socialist Democrats. They want a champion for conservative values…. be pro religion, implement right to work for federal employees, be anti-abortion, support a marriage amendment, repeal Obamacare, cut federal government by 20%, get government out of the investment business, get rid of the Fed, get rid of the Department of Education, take a tough stance on supporting the military, stop the incremental domination of the Middle East by radical Muslims, push through the flat tax, drill for oil, build nuclear, dig for coal.

Mitt talks too fast, too much, and says too little with passion. Listen to these words by Newt about what he will do to terrorists: “I will kill them.” and compare that to the thousands of words that Mitt says.

So far, Mitt has the experience and smarts to save America, but lacks the demonstrable passion to make conservatives believe that he will actually do it. He needs to get emotional. He needs to say less, slower, and yet communicate more.

He cannot walk in the middle and expect to win.

So how can this message be delivered to Mitt?

Michael Charles Master
www.saveamericanow.us.com

http://atlah.org Support Dr. Laurie Roth for president in 2012. http://laurieroth2012.com Recorded on 13 April 2012.

Pastor James David Manning says if you don’t quit, you’re going to make it. Recorded on 13 April 2012.

“ATLAH: THAT’S WHAT GOD SAID.”
Anointed to establish families, churches and businesses, unlike any the world hath seen. Indeed the final product of the land, ATLAH, will boast of being the seat of the world’s banking, business, and education centers.

Love us or hate us?
Please Support Us

http://bit.ly/wP2lQ1